And we pay for this …
See - Ben Sandilands - Plane Talking; through Crikey; And we pay for this – The MK &Co article is of double interest. In the first place, it typifies the ‘expert’, hands on, rapid response first class industry analysts must provide to airlines. Make no mistake,...
An overload of Bollocks? Nope.
Erm; Thorny’s post may seem to have a load of BOLLOCKS in it; but I can assure you, it’s actually a modest, quite conservative amount; considering the volume of reform being delivered. My grandmamma used to say ‘when you’re in a hole, quit digging’. This Skidmore...
Any chance of good sense prevailing?
Ean Higgens. The Australian. Another nicely balanced article from that man ‘Iggins; some of the subtleties, complexity and complications of airspace management touched on, without taking the topic beyond the grasp and interest of the ‘man at the back of the room’....
A Sunday ramble.
The Enforceable v Affordable safety - a twiddle. Whether we get another chance to voice an opinion to a Senate committee is in the lap of the gods. But, if we do, I’ve been playing about with some of PAIN associates theories and notions related to ‘safety’ as in the...
Addendum – Reform hopes DAS’d.
The following quotes/excerpts are taken from the AIPA submission 8 to the Pel-Air cover-up Senate Inquiry. A submission I might add that is well worth taking the time to read in it's entirety First this on the standards of the ATSB reports: From bottom of page 8:...
Reform hopes DAS’d.
It is most satisfactory when a respected group, like AIPA weigh in and support the IOS claims. It’s not too bad when a piece of PAIN research is picked up and expanded either; but the icing on the cake is that both reports were looked at by the Committee in relation...