Comment: Being mischievous here but PAIN is generally speaking boycotting Pprune except for this thread – Norfolk Island Ditching ATSB Report – ? -which we recently brought to life again with this post:-
Now this was despite the thread being currently the most popular on page one (active) of the ANZ&P forum and from my estimates (if the counter had been working) would have surpassed 800k views in recent days…
Oh well PPRuNe is entitled to do what they must do…
However in the interest of some continuity and without upsetting (hopefully) the Skygods or the mods and as the PelAir insanity is really a GA issue the BRB (and some members of the IOS) have asked me to continue the Senate thread here…so here goes (big breath..
) the last page of the 2nd infamous Senate Inquiry thread…#2681 – Mooted messages?#2682
#2683
#2684 – Episode 316: Beaker’s spin recycle machine.
#2685 – The Dolan prophesy.
#2686 – Episode 317: The lone muppet mission.
#2687 – What is that awful smell?
There is a definite odour of cynicism toward Australian involvement in the MH 370 affair creeping into the international press, previously only visible on Bloggs. The bloggers caught on early and responded cynically to the Dolan involvement. I wonder what they will make of it once Pel-Air becomes the international yardstick against which any ATSB involvement, no matter how far removed, will be measured in the future.
The steaming pile Muscles McComic and Doolally Doolan have left behind for the rest to clean up will take a while to shift. Even when it’s moved away the stench will linger despite the best deodorising efforts of the Word Weasels, spin doctors and the like. No matter, ATSB will investigate the ATSB, a clean sheet will be provided and all will be well once more. It’s a first class move as CASA gets to slither off the hook and out the back door – once again.
Then children, you shall see a lengthy queue forming around the block of all the regulators in the known world patiently waiting to buy their signed, Senate supported copy of Part 61 and the Beyond All Reason method of air crash investigations.
Absolutely stellar Australia; just ducking wonderful.
… 
…
….
…
| Absolutely stellar Australia; just ducking wonderful. |
Exactly Ferryman what an embarrassing smear on the good people at the coalface that were initially involved with the surface search; & now with the underwater deep sea search; not to mention the huge waste of taxpayer funded resources if it all ends up for nought, especially if it comes out that we have either been misled or are in collusion with the Malaysians…
If that were to transpire then indeed the parallels with the PelAir cover-up would be complete…
While on the subject of the PelAir debacle I noticed the following has been posted courtesy of Australian Flying online – ATSB to feel PAIN over Pel-Air Investigation
| A confidential group known as the Professional Aviators Investigative Network (PAIN) has raised concerns over the ATSB review of the Pel-Air ditching report.Late last year, the ATSB agreed to review the report into the 2009 ditching of a Pel-Air aeromedical flight at Norfolk Island, after a Canadian review highlighted anomalies with the investigation report.In a submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport (RRAT) written in December, the group has criticised the ATSB’s decision to use one of their own people to lead the review.
“… the ATSB [has] elected to utilise Dr Michael Walker of the ATSB to lead the investigation,” the PAIN submission points out. “We believe that to be effective, any investigation should be conducted independently and not involve ATSB, the commissioners or staff if only to preclude any suspicion of ‘internal’ influence or external bias being raised.” PAIN is also concerned that the terms of reference announced by General Manager Aviation Safety Investigations IanSangston do not go far enough. “The terms of reference cited by Mr Sangston are narrow and only mention the ‘report’ itself. Whilst the industry acknowledges that the report was substandard, there is little doubt that the investigators conducted their work with integrity and within the prescribed guidelines. Indeed, the early stages of the ATSB report were exemplary and clearly directed toward serious safety recommendations being made. “We believe little will be gained by utilising scarce resources re-investigating the original ATSB investigative ‘reports’.” Instead, PAIN points the finger of blame for the original Pel-Air investigation report squarely at the both CASA and the ATSB and hints at deeper issues. “Our greatest concern is that a deliberate, calculated manipulation of the national aviation safety system was attempted. It is not a ‘one off’ aberration. We firmly believe that the subsequent actions of both the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and the ATSB were proven, by the AAI [RRAT inquiry] committee, to grossly pervert the conclusions of the ATSB investigation to suit a clearly predetermined outcome, thus denying industry valuable, safety related knowledge and information. “It is the process by which these subsequent events occurred which demands an independent investigation conducted transparently in public. We believe the Senate Committee is the right reporting and oversight platform for that investigation. The committee Senators are well briefed, informed and have a firm, current understanding of what transpired during the events subsequent to the Pel-Air aircraft ditching off Norfolk Island. “Further, the Estimates committee is very clearly ‘awake’ to the machinations of the various aviation oversight bodies and will not easily be misled or confounded by ‘technical’ issues. “We submit that any other form of investigation will not withstand the scrutiny of industry experts; as the initial premise is fatally flawed |
Well done PAIN…
Hmm…perhaps more IOS members should follow the PAIN initiative??
I’ll be back…
