A Gold Star Plug.

The Last Minute Hitch: 24 October 2025

24 October 2025

– Steve Hitchen

I have often heard jump pilots saying how much fun they have flying the Cresco/750 XSTOL airframe once the jumpers have departed. It's been compared to fighter planes in its performance, especially on the return to Earth. Yesterday, NZAero extended to me the privilege of having a go myself. I understand now what the jump pilots have been saying to me. In the skies over Bendigo, pilot and director Dee Bond showed me exactly what this remarkable airframe was capable of. My take: it's a pilot's aircraft with the versatility of a Holden ute and the responsiveness of a aerobat. Being one of very few (or perhaps the only?) SETP available with stick controls, and fitted with a 900-shp PT6, it lends itself to serious flying fun. Think about this: the team has logged 70 flying hours around Australia including the Outback Air Race and crossing the Nullarbor. All of this was hand-flown; as the demo aeroplane is configured for jumps, it has no autopilot. That shows you how controllable it really is. Thanks to the team at NZAero for making their demonstrator available, and to Bendigo Flying Club for hosting. You can read more about this in March-April 2026 Australian Flying.

"..this new set of rules is very much in their playground.."

You can count the number of US LSA manufacturers on the fingers of one hand, but you can do that with European manufacturers only if that hand is holding a calculator. Although companies like Zenith, Icon, Vashon, Texas and Super Petrel have their markets, these models have nothing like the world-wide penetration of Aeroprakt, Tecnam, Pipistrel, Flight Design, Bristell, Alpi and so many other marques. This week, the MOSAIC rules to modernise LSAs came into effect in the USA, which may just galvanise some other US-based manufacturers to start prospecting in what is expected to be very rich vein. Cessna had a crack a few years ago with the ill-fated C162, and Piper made an even more flaccid effort with the PiperSport, but this new set of rules is very much in their playground, being more akin to GA aircraft than to LSAs of old. It wouldn't take much engineering to adapt the PA-28 airframe, and the C172 likewise, giving them a head-start on European manufacturers. However, within the halls of Wichita and Vero Beach, brains trusts will have been asking this question for months, possibly years: how do we get into this without bastardising our own markets for the four-seaters? We might get their answers next year, when I am expecting a flood of announcements about new models to hit the market. But, in Australia, there are other questions for our manufacturers to ask, chiefly, how do we maximise our opportunity given the dominance of the European aeroplane builders? The answer as I see it is to be first to market. Get the product out there before new Tecnams, Aeroprakts and Flight Designs start to land on our shores. If there is any country in the world that fits the MOSAIC ethos better than most, it is Australia, and opportunities like this come our way so very rarely.
I heard a chilling transmission yesterday when I was making my way up the Kilmore Gap to Bendigo. It was Melbourne Centre on 135.7 issuing a Safety Alert to two aircraft near Avalon that they would be in conflict with each other in one minute. Good work Centre, I thought. It chilled me to hear soon after Centre issuing a pained warning that the two aircraft then had only 10 seconds to avoid each other! It prompted me to ask a question: what the hell had those two pilots been doing for 50 seconds? As both VFR aircraft appeared to be in G or E airspace, Centre can't give them vectors to de-conflict; that is up to the pilots themselves. To do that, they first need to be switched on enough to cotton on that the call was directed to them. Co-incidentally, returning from Bendigo, I started a climb to clear expected rotors coming off the ridge NW of Kilmore. Almost immediately I heard Centre pass traffic to another aircraft in the same area as me on an unverified VFR paint climbing towards 4000 anticipating a conflict. I reckoned that was me. I called Centre, told them what I was doing and responded to a squawk ident request. I was indeed the paint in question. I stopped climbing. Deconfliction was established, and I got thanked for it. I don't know what became of the Avalon conflict, but I know for listening out and taking action, I arrived home much less stressed than if I'd been given a 10-second warning.

May your gauges always be in the green,

Hitch



Comment from 2 weeks ago:

Dave Prossor14 days ago

Not so far back the Government sold of all the non-major secondary airpprts. The attitude was sink or swim. If they closed the Feds could not have cared.

Since that time the Government has slowly come to the realisation that country people are entitled to and should have access to all the things that the city people have and get. Medical assistance, emergency aid during flood or fire, air flights to the big smoke. Flying Doctor. And much more.

It has taken quite some time for the penny to drop that country people are entitled to all those things that city people take for granted. Our Feds have slowly realised that country people needs and should have airstrips that are fit for purpose. Many votes are involved?

Granting big dollars to support country airstrips, and there should be many more, is not a case of the Feds being good guys and doing this. It is something that the Feds should have been doing a long time back and must continue to do.
Reply

The Last Minute Hitch: 31 October 2025

31 October 2025

– Steve Hitchen

In The Last Minute Hitch on 2 May this year, I had a shot at all our federal pollies over a lack of support for GA and in particular the 47th parliament's omission of a Parliamentary Friends of Aviation Group. This week it was re-instated in the 48th parliament, and rightly so by my account. Friends groups create bipartisan environments for politicians and industry advocates to meet and hold informal conversations about issues concerning industry sectors. It's a good way for opinions to mingle. The aviation group, if we're being honest, will focus more on airlines and airports, but GA will get a coat-tails attachment thanks to the involvement of the Regional Aviation Association of Australia. RAAA CEO and GAAN chair Rob Walker attended the launch, and his organisation is on record as saying they will stand as advocates for GA in the absence of a more vocal and active lobby group. The beauty about Friends groups is that the onus to listen is thrown back on the pollies; that is the very point of the groups. And as membership of any is not mandatory, we at least know they're in it because they have genuine interest in aviation. Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is a pilot herself, so the aviation community will be watching carefully to see if she has enough interest to join the group.

"..the government is trying to introduce a mandate the GA community is not in a position to accept.."

One topic that should be heavily debated by the Parliamentary Friends of Aviation is the proposed VFR ADS-B mandate. This is proving a controversial issue that is attracting some very visceral opinions; opinions that are dividing the private and recreational GA sectors into the yeasayers and the naysayers. The demarcation line seems to be around cost, which is one of the key points of the RAAus submission made public this week. Only the harshest critics would hold that ADS-B has not increased situational awareness and lowered the chances of traffic conflict, leaving cost as the primary objection to a mandate. That, and as RAAus has noted, a dearth of engineers qualified to fit equipment. For recreational aircraft, where weight is always a consideration, many owners will opt for Electronic Conspicuity (EC) devices rather than panel-mounted equipment, which doesn't need an engineer to install. But that's not a solution for everyone because EC devices can't be used for separation in controlled airspace. RAAus is perhaps right in their contention that there is information and issues missing from the discussion paper. I can't help but feel the government is trying to introduce a mandate the GA community is not in a position to accept because the complete gamut of impact is not fully understood. Hopefully, this consultation will correct that.

In 16 days time, the hourglass runs out of sand on the 2025 CASA Wings Awards nominations. By now, you should be at the polishing stage of your submission. By "polishing" I mean tightening the links between your contentions and the criteria for the specific category. That's how nominations are successful. Now in their 12th installment, the Wings Awards have honoured some of the most dedicated people and groups we have in general aviation, and each one of the winners owes something to the person or persons that nominated them. What that means is the nominator is a large part of the success of the nominee, and they need to play their part not only by making the submission in the first place, but making sure it is the best in its category. We hope to see your prospective Wings Awards winner in the short list soon.

May your gauges always be in the green,

Hitch
Reply

The Last Minute Hitch: 7 November 2025

7 November 2025

– Steve Hitchen

The new LSA regulations were always going to take some sculpting to fit into the Australian mold, if for no other reason than the cross-over of LSAs between RAAus and CASA. However, it seems there are parts of the regulations over here that also need some reworking to make sure everything fits. And it seems CASA is hitting the decks running, but can't move faster on this than standard bureaucratic speed. It would do no good to fast-track MOSAIC in Australia anyway; it will be Oshkosh next year before the first aircraft to the new standard can be registered. The GA community–particularly the manufacturers–are dead keen to see this implemented, and a new era in GA ushered in, so their impatience to get going with it is understandable. What we need CASA to do is make sure our regulatory regime is ready to go when the FAA pushes the button in July next year. That's where the phased implementation should work for us, but it may mean that RAAus has to be left behind temporarily to enable at least GA to go forward with the new aircraft. When or if RAAus catches up is still the subject of a lot of work behind the scenes on behalf of both CASA and RAAus; too much, in fact, to be allowed to hold back the rest of the aviation community.

"..this is not a brave new world into which REX 2.0 will go.."

After the Federal Government slung $220 million in the direction of REX and its pending suitor, I think other regional airlines are justified in asking "what about us?" RAAA CEO Rob Walker has been vocal in pointing out that REX is not the only regional airline in Australia, none of which are rolling in cash, yet still provide a vital service to remote and regional communities that would otherwise remain isolated. The $5 million allotted to airports to which REX owes money has only exacerbated the feeling of being left behind. Are these services not as valuable as those provided by REX, or do you have to hit the bottom of the well before someone throws you a rope? The latter is maybe fanciful thinking; Australian aviation history is coloured by regional airlines that bottomed out whilst the government did nothing more than send a condolence card. Sometimes not even that. But this ALP government is going all out. When Air T grabs the keys to the REX doors, they will be in possession of an airline and a name, and control of an ageing SAAB 340 fleet that the Australian government has caveats on. That's a brilliant deal for Air T, and one that is unlikely to have been struck were it not for the desperation of Team Albanese to keep REX plying their trade. However, I feel that this is not a brave new world into which REX 2.0 will go, but rather a fraught one that has broken more hearts than Farmer Wants a Wife. In the back of my mind I feel this is not an arrangement that is eternal given the parlous nature of regional aviation and the rachitic nature of the deal at hand. There are a number of failure points in regional aviation that are not negated purely by a change of ownership, and Air T will have to work some serious magic in order to justify the government's willingness to invest eye-crossing dollars; dollars that would have been very welcome at other regional airlines.

On Monday week nominations for the 2025 CASA Wings Awards will close. At that time the judging panel will convene to begin their deliberations. And, as is expected, sifting through submissions to find the most worthy winners will be a time-consuming and quite stressful one. But that doesn't mean the judges won't enjoy it. I have been on the judging panel since the very beginning, and one of the thinks I like about reading the nominations is the passion that comes through in the best ones. We get to learn so much about the amazing people that make up GA in Australia, and in the very end of it all we zero-in on the best of the best and anoint them as the winners for 2025. In truth, it's a satisfying job, and one that all of us are proud to perform. So if you haven't finished your nomination yet, impress us; we are waiting eagerly to read what you have to say.

May your gauges always be in the green,

Hitch 
Reply

The Last Minute Hitch: 14 November 2025

14 November 2025

– Steve Hitchen

I made several errors on my last GA flight review, which was done in an Archer. They were simple things that really should have been second-nature to me. Nothing serious ... if you don't count embarrassment as serious. On reflection, I understood that each error was something that was a variation on the well-practised procedures that applied to my Tecnam. And this was after only 12 months of letting my GA currency lapse. I cannot image how foreign a simple Archer would have felt after 15 years! But at Porepunkah in May a pilot stepped into a type that they hadn't flown for exactly that period of time, and the variances between that aircraft and what they had been flying since came back to bite them hard. The more we fly a type, the more our hands, feet and brains become trained to it. They say if you don't use it you lose it, and when we stop using it the muscle memory becomes forgetful and concentrates on what it has learned since. The sight of a crumpled EC120 lying on its side should be enough evidence to convince you of that. Type currency is a good promoter of aviation safety and a barrier against flying misadventure; pilots should think of it as a crucial tool in their airmanship toolbox. Another is the courage to say "I'm not flying that, I'm not current."

There is a swell of opinion saying it can't be done

Difficult things take a long time to do, even longer if you want to get them right. I suspect this is what is driving the Office of Airspace Regulation (OAR) as they try to fashion some form of lifeline for Bankstown Airport. OAR's first effort in creating the Engadine Corridor was dumped early this year after industry feedback labeled it unworkable and probably unsafe. At the time, an alternative was promised mid-2025, and here it is November and the new plan has not yet been released. Will we see it this year? I would wager No at this stage, but wouldn't rule out a dump-and-run in the last working days before Christmas. The most likely reason we haven't seen it before now is that a practical, safe solution for a VFR corridor to Bankstown is not emerging easily thanks to the crunch of airspace caused by Western Sydney International. And I suspect OAR has been stung a touch by how quickly the GA community torpedoed their original proposal, generating a determination to get this as close as they can to acceptable before unleashing it on the world. But can they actually achieve that? There is a swell of opinion saying it can't be done; that too much airspace has been allocated to WSI to enable Bankstown to remain a training hub. I hope that is not the case, but fear OAR's next attempt won't come within a 747's take-off roll of providing much relief to what has become a besieged airport. My only disappointment is that I won't get a chance to present an analysis of this when it does come.

Here's why.

The last three years have seen a few changes in the editorial team at Australian Flying, with Kreisha Ballantyne taking on the print magazine, a new publisher in James Ostinga and new people joining the ranks of feature writers. There is one more change to come in 2025: me. My tenure as editor of the Australian Flying website and the weekly eNews is coming to an end in December, and as a consequence, The Last Minute Hitch will also cease. Kreisha Ballantyne will take on editing the eNews and website as well as the print magazine from early 2026, bringing her own style and fresh ideas to the site. It's bittersweet for me; I have been full-time with the magazine and website since March 2012, and although I have learnt so much and interacted with so many knowledgeable experts, it has been a taxing role. My plan now is to return to the role of freelance feature writer for the print version, so I won't be disappearing completely. You knowledgeable experts will still be seeing my name displayed when your mobile rings for a bit longer. The final LMH is due out on 12 December, after that you will all need a different way of finding out that it's Friday.

May your gauges always be in the green,

Hitch

Good bye LMH - Sad
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)