Just my two bobs worth.
Is there a point here not being clearly made, one which would need (IMO) to clarified – if we are to be impartial. Did the CASA chap step aggressively toward Glen into his space and need 'pushing': or; did Glen advance toward the CASA chap and then do the pushing? The 'finger tip' don't argue action needed a trigger; so we need to work out which was 'chicken and what was egg'. Without 'independent witness testimony; I reckon its a 50/50 chance of being dismissed on a 'he said - she said' basis.
But if Glen fails to wake up, wise up, shut up and get some serious help; then CASA legal crew will shoot his boots off – using ammunition which he, himself has generously provided them.
Is there a point here not being clearly made, one which would need (IMO) to clarified – if we are to be impartial. Did the CASA chap step aggressively toward Glen into his space and need 'pushing': or; did Glen advance toward the CASA chap and then do the pushing? The 'finger tip' don't argue action needed a trigger; so we need to work out which was 'chicken and what was egg'. Without 'independent witness testimony; I reckon its a 50/50 chance of being dismissed on a 'he said - she said' basis.
But if Glen fails to wake up, wise up, shut up and get some serious help; then CASA legal crew will shoot his boots off – using ammunition which he, himself has generously provided them.