[Wombat]

Sandy, I am a supporter of Glen on the basis that there is truth in what he alleges. However and with respect to Glen and his erstwhile supporters, I have bitter and very expensive (at least $300,000) experience to the effect that there are two sides to every story.

I have been told and unfortunately bought, similar stories to Glen's, not involving CASA. Similar he said/she said claims were made of operatic levels of wrongdoing. I didn't check the attestations of documentary evidence as to what was said and done until it was too late. The 'evidence" turned out to be non existent of even contradictory, leaving me stranded after having spent over $300,000 on project costs.

I have asked Glen about transactions with CASA before and received no response. Some actual .jpgs or scanned .pdf's of CASA documents as evidence are in my opinion required, not more operatic posts on UP. I wish him all the best but if I don't see physical evidence I cannot rule out the possibility that there is a simple explanation to his problem that does not involve devilish levels of deceit by CASA. That includes the possibility that privacy laws might prevent Dr. Aleck from defending himself.

Sorry to be crude, I make no apologies but I want to see the evidence. I've been here before. If no physical evidence, in the form of unequivocal writings, then Glen has no case.