Gross insult? Oh, Duck yes.
P7 is excused UP watch duties; it’s furry muff, he flatly refused to join in when we all played over there, turns out he was correct about it’s present value and future worth in relation to getting anything of value done.
I was obliged to have a look at the posts (one) - (two) which caused so much fury; seems it’s not only P7 who took umbrage. The latest line of argument is the 'justification' for calling the report presented by the Rev. Forsyth and two other highly qualified, expert observers “an opinion”. This, to prop up the Oliver-Skidmore-Twist dismissal of the ASRR; which is bad enough; but wait, there’s more.
The ‘opinion’ that ASRR is an opinion is based on ‘legal’ principals, seems CASA don’t feel a need to do anything without challenging and testing the evidence. Seems we have to now prove they are a worthless, amateurish, incompetent bunch of charlatans. Just like in court; seems that the ASRR and it’s submissions must be tested for probity, before CASA will believe any of it. The suggestion is that not only ‘we’ but Rev. Forsyth and his crew are all lying through our teeth; and, unless CASA can challenge each and every statement allowed in as ‘evidence’, then try to have those ‘disallowed, then have the remaining tested under cross examination with the associated hoop-la of clever lawyers, then nothing can be believed. Even then any result will be subject to appeal, just like the CVD case.
This is really now a matter for industry to take up; not in court, that will take more years than I have remaining and cost more than we could ever afford. The TAAAF and the aligned ‘alphabet groups’ need to put their collective foot on throat of this total shambles we refer to as the ‘authority’. Collectively. From the ‘big hitters’ such as AIPA and Qantas, through to old mate and his Wilga sitting in some tin shed back of beyond.
The insult is brazen; the notion that AIPA, VIPA, David Forsyth or even old mate would, in open submission to government inquiry, tell ‘fairy stories is noxious.
How can any industry survive in such a toxic atmosphere? Is a valid question. But more to the point, how can industry just lay down and accept the inevitable after the ASRR?
“Surely, you mean raped my dear?”
“No M’lud, I was graped; there was a bunch of ‘em”.
Endit: not worth the steam or a Sunday ramble; we’ll save the coals for when we need ‘em GD. When this industry gets off it’s collective arse and bellows ENOUGH.
Toot toot.
Edit: I don’t think I’ve ever read such an unmitigated load of crap on any forum, anywhere. I sincerely hope I never have to do so again. Words fail - about here…….
P7 is excused UP watch duties; it’s furry muff, he flatly refused to join in when we all played over there, turns out he was correct about it’s present value and future worth in relation to getting anything of value done.
I was obliged to have a look at the posts (one) - (two) which caused so much fury; seems it’s not only P7 who took umbrage. The latest line of argument is the 'justification' for calling the report presented by the Rev. Forsyth and two other highly qualified, expert observers “an opinion”. This, to prop up the Oliver-Skidmore-Twist dismissal of the ASRR; which is bad enough; but wait, there’s more.
The ‘opinion’ that ASRR is an opinion is based on ‘legal’ principals, seems CASA don’t feel a need to do anything without challenging and testing the evidence. Seems we have to now prove they are a worthless, amateurish, incompetent bunch of charlatans. Just like in court; seems that the ASRR and it’s submissions must be tested for probity, before CASA will believe any of it. The suggestion is that not only ‘we’ but Rev. Forsyth and his crew are all lying through our teeth; and, unless CASA can challenge each and every statement allowed in as ‘evidence’, then try to have those ‘disallowed, then have the remaining tested under cross examination with the associated hoop-la of clever lawyers, then nothing can be believed. Even then any result will be subject to appeal, just like the CVD case.
This is really now a matter for industry to take up; not in court, that will take more years than I have remaining and cost more than we could ever afford. The TAAAF and the aligned ‘alphabet groups’ need to put their collective foot on throat of this total shambles we refer to as the ‘authority’. Collectively. From the ‘big hitters’ such as AIPA and Qantas, through to old mate and his Wilga sitting in some tin shed back of beyond.
The insult is brazen; the notion that AIPA, VIPA, David Forsyth or even old mate would, in open submission to government inquiry, tell ‘fairy stories is noxious.
How can any industry survive in such a toxic atmosphere? Is a valid question. But more to the point, how can industry just lay down and accept the inevitable after the ASRR?
“Surely, you mean raped my dear?”
“No M’lud, I was graped; there was a bunch of ‘em”.
Endit: not worth the steam or a Sunday ramble; we’ll save the coals for when we need ‘em GD. When this industry gets off it’s collective arse and bellows ENOUGH.
Toot toot.
Edit: I don’t think I’ve ever read such an unmitigated load of crap on any forum, anywhere. I sincerely hope I never have to do so again. Words fail - about here…….