02-24-2017, 07:40 PM
Add:
Found it (closest ping to satellite) on JWise first MH370 post:
http://jeffwise.net/2014/03/22/why-we-no...ght-route/
"On Friday, March 21, an Inmarsat spokesman told me that “the ping timings got longer,” meaning that the distance between MH370 and the satellite grew increasingly bigger, and never smaller. That means that at no point during its subsequent travels did MH370 travel any closer to Inmarsat. So from the 2.11am ping data alone, we can rule out every spot within the green arc:"
Hups, 1811 is mentioned... which would be expected. And it was not explained later, why the heck they came up with this, if there was no such 1811 ping?? Did i miss it?
Found it (closest ping to satellite) on JWise first MH370 post:
http://jeffwise.net/2014/03/22/why-we-no...ght-route/
"On Friday, March 21, an Inmarsat spokesman told me that “the ping timings got longer,” meaning that the distance between MH370 and the satellite grew increasingly bigger, and never smaller. That means that at no point during its subsequent travels did MH370 travel any closer to Inmarsat. So from the 2.11am ping data alone, we can rule out every spot within the green arc:"
Hups, 1811 is mentioned... which would be expected. And it was not explained later, why the heck they came up with this, if there was no such 1811 ping?? Did i miss it?