[ventus45]

airlandseaman

Going back to the Inmarsat log, and your post #137.

Q1.  Why do you think the Malaysians were so careful to only release a "redacted set" of "one-way" communications from the AIRCRAFT TO THE GROUND STATION (i.e. AES to the GES) in the first place ?

Q2.  Why do you think they "SPECIFICALLY DID NOT" include the first two lines, which were later added in the "update" - after everyone "screamed for them" ?

Q3.  What do you think they were (or might have been, or still may be) trying to hide ?

Q4.  Do you think that there are actually (or may be) "more" AES to GES transmissions that "have not been published", and if so, what clues or thoughts do you have, that might lead you to surmise, that they may exist (if you do have thoughts along those or similar lines) ?

Q5.  In your opinion, given that we only have a "partial set" of "one-way" logs, (AES to GES) would (or could) the "complete" set, including the other half of the communications (i.e. from GES to AES), (so that we would then (supposedly) have the full "two-way" log) help with nailing down the system timeing (for which we NEED the "P" channel data).

Q6.  Why do you think they refused to release the P channel data ?

Q7.  Would having the P channel data assist your analysis at all ?

Q8.  Specifically, would having the P channel data assist your analysis of system latency timings etc, specifically, would it help nailing down the "bias" issue between the different channels (R & T) (given that the bias is integral to calculating the positions of the arcs) ?

Q9.  For the "handshake pings", and the 00:19's in particular, would the complete set of "two-way" communications help at all ?