04-07-2015, 11:56 AM
As previously quoted "For example - CI - "Previously, when questioned on why MH370 was not intercepted although its identity could not be ascertained at the time, Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak replied that air defence officers were certain that the aircraft was not hostile. This was because although the identity of the aircraft was unknown, it behaved like a commercial airliner, he said."
hishy also admitted they didn't track this in real time either & was not identified as mh370, but they ran with it anyhow as fact, made up the bogus radar that has since been debunked and then the IG guys based BFO data (also bogus) on bogus radar data. Shame on malaysia for making up stuff, but then the IG guys come and make up more stuff based on assumptions and NOT REAL FACTS. Yet all the so called experts are basing their search on assumptions. Angus Houston has all but crawled out they a narrow window to escape the embarrassment of the ping pong facade.
the whole SIO search is based on a lie, how many millions of $$ wasted on bogus search, I think it was an excuse to do the baths surveys of unmapped ocean floor. It's real sad to continue a bogus search where they KNOW the plane isn't and never was. Malaysia was asleep at the wheel but rather than admit they screwed up, they invent a radar track, then INMARSAT hijacks the search to thousands of miles from where the plane really is. To start from scratch is hard to do, but going back to the beginning where it all began is likely the easiest answer. That plane never left the gulf of Thailand. I have thought is from the beginning. I had my theory from the start and got tramped on and called names by trolls when I didn't subscribe to their wild and outlandish theories. How about a simple answer? Anyone interested?
hishy also admitted they didn't track this in real time either & was not identified as mh370, but they ran with it anyhow as fact, made up the bogus radar that has since been debunked and then the IG guys based BFO data (also bogus) on bogus radar data. Shame on malaysia for making up stuff, but then the IG guys come and make up more stuff based on assumptions and NOT REAL FACTS. Yet all the so called experts are basing their search on assumptions. Angus Houston has all but crawled out they a narrow window to escape the embarrassment of the ping pong facade.
the whole SIO search is based on a lie, how many millions of $$ wasted on bogus search, I think it was an excuse to do the baths surveys of unmapped ocean floor. It's real sad to continue a bogus search where they KNOW the plane isn't and never was. Malaysia was asleep at the wheel but rather than admit they screwed up, they invent a radar track, then INMARSAT hijacks the search to thousands of miles from where the plane really is. To start from scratch is hard to do, but going back to the beginning where it all began is likely the easiest answer. That plane never left the gulf of Thailand. I have thought is from the beginning. I had my theory from the start and got tramped on and called names by trolls when I didn't subscribe to their wild and outlandish theories. How about a simple answer? Anyone interested?