03-06-2023, 04:06 PM
Good work from the indefatigable PeeTwo.
But going back one comment, Wombat:-
“Secondly, the CEO/DAS should not be a member of the Board as this precludes discussion of his performance at Board level.” (Or her)
This is so obvious and the fact that this inappropriate situation has been allowed in the first place, let alone perpetuated by the Board, and as acquiesced by the Department and Minister, shows how careless is the very basic governance of CASA.
And by the very nature of Board governance the CEO should subservient to the Board to ensure proper respect by the CEO of the Board’s wishes. The CEO is not an equal to the Board members, but should have status of an employee.
A similar example might be the Department head of Defence being a voting member of Cabinet.
The CEO’s Board membership is an egregious anomaly, and one that we should strive to have corrected.
But going back one comment, Wombat:-
“Secondly, the CEO/DAS should not be a member of the Board as this precludes discussion of his performance at Board level.” (Or her)
This is so obvious and the fact that this inappropriate situation has been allowed in the first place, let alone perpetuated by the Board, and as acquiesced by the Department and Minister, shows how careless is the very basic governance of CASA.
And by the very nature of Board governance the CEO should subservient to the Board to ensure proper respect by the CEO of the Board’s wishes. The CEO is not an equal to the Board members, but should have status of an employee.
A similar example might be the Department head of Defence being a voting member of Cabinet.
The CEO’s Board membership is an egregious anomaly, and one that we should strive to have corrected.