Utter Bullshyte. I fail to understand how the DAS could believe this.
From her speech:
"Hearing words like this bring me a lot of satisfaction.
It means the approach CASA is taking is working and allowing businesses to innovate and prosper.
Despite what some people may say, those of us who work in the government sector do think and care about the real-world outcomes of policies, decisions and actions.
I know that in CASA I have a team of aviation experts who constantly strive to get the best possible safety and operational outcomes for the sectors we regulate.
Safety is of course the number one priority, but we also have a responsibility to ensure regulations and requirements do not stop businesses and individuals reaching their potential and being rewarded for their efforts.
This is particularly important in fast growing and innovating sectors where the burden of unnecessary red tape can stymie new ideas and discourage investment at critical points.."
The statements above are utterly and completely at variance with everything CASA has done as evidenced by submissions to Forsyth, the current Senate enquiry and of course what they recently did to Glen Buckley and APTA. How can CASA keep doing this with a straight face?
From her speech:
"Hearing words like this bring me a lot of satisfaction.
It means the approach CASA is taking is working and allowing businesses to innovate and prosper.
Despite what some people may say, those of us who work in the government sector do think and care about the real-world outcomes of policies, decisions and actions.
I know that in CASA I have a team of aviation experts who constantly strive to get the best possible safety and operational outcomes for the sectors we regulate.
Safety is of course the number one priority, but we also have a responsibility to ensure regulations and requirements do not stop businesses and individuals reaching their potential and being rewarded for their efforts.
This is particularly important in fast growing and innovating sectors where the burden of unnecessary red tape can stymie new ideas and discourage investment at critical points.."
The statements above are utterly and completely at variance with everything CASA has done as evidenced by submissions to Forsyth, the current Senate enquiry and of course what they recently did to Glen Buckley and APTA. How can CASA keep doing this with a straight face?