Su-Spence broken promises and (BS) platitudes?? - 
A year and over a million dollars later; it is now time to start completing the IOS/BRB review on the Su_Spence performance so far...
Let's start with the matter of Andy Pascoe v CASA where I refer to the following extract from CASA supp submission 46.2 :
Having reviewed all tabled documents etc. from the (at this stage, still ongoing) GA Inquiry webpages it would appear Su_Spence has reneged on the promise to "inform the Committee of the outcome of its review of the transcripts". This assumption was confirmed in communications with the RRAT committee Secretariat. The Secretariat's comment on this was that CASA may have delayed their response waiting for the outcome of the Federal election.
I call bollocks on this as this is an open inquiry and although the committee needs to be reconstituted (probably early August once the 47th Parliament begins sitting), the committee Secretariat is doing business and still accepting submissions etc. to the inquiry. I also call bollocks because the Spence supp submission with that promise was published in early January 2022, 3 months before the calling of the Federal election...
P2 - IOS/BRB rumour mill: While on the Andy Pascoe case I understand there is some pretty disturbing revelations still to come out from the last court day hearing, with associated rumours of internal wranglings leading all the way up to the Su_Spence office -
MTF? Yes much! - P2
A year and over a million dollars later; it is now time to start completing the IOS/BRB review on the Su_Spence performance so far...
Let's start with the matter of Andy Pascoe v CASA where I refer to the following extract from CASA supp submission 46.2 :
Quote:Alleged concerns about CASA CEO not providing evidence
In AFA’s opening statement to the hearing, Mrs Pagani said that in a Local Court matter, the
presiding magistrate had indicated it might be necessary to ‘subpoena the CEO of CASA, issue a
summons for her arrest to bring her before this court to explain why CASA had not provided
information’ (Proof Hansard, pp. 23 and 24).
CASA assumes the litigation referred to is the criminal prosecution of Mr Andrew Pascoe mounted by
the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) on three (3) charges under the
Commonwealth Criminal Code. The matter is currently before the Parramatta Local Court.
CASA has conferred with the CDPP and the Australian Government Solicitor (who appeared for CASA
in connection with questions related to the production of documents), who both advise they are
unaware of any suggestion by the Magistrate that action should be taken against the CEO.
These assurances notwithstanding, CASA has ordered transcripts of all relevant portions of the
proceedings to determine if any such remarks were made. CASA has been advised it may take several
weeks for these transcripts to be provided. As soon as reasonably practicable, CASA will inform the
Committee of the outcome of its review of the transcripts.
Having reviewed all tabled documents etc. from the (at this stage, still ongoing) GA Inquiry webpages it would appear Su_Spence has reneged on the promise to "inform the Committee of the outcome of its review of the transcripts". This assumption was confirmed in communications with the RRAT committee Secretariat. The Secretariat's comment on this was that CASA may have delayed their response waiting for the outcome of the Federal election.
I call bollocks on this as this is an open inquiry and although the committee needs to be reconstituted (probably early August once the 47th Parliament begins sitting), the committee Secretariat is doing business and still accepting submissions etc. to the inquiry. I also call bollocks because the Spence supp submission with that promise was published in early January 2022, 3 months before the calling of the Federal election...
P2 - IOS/BRB rumour mill: While on the Andy Pascoe case I understand there is some pretty disturbing revelations still to come out from the last court day hearing, with associated rumours of internal wranglings leading all the way up to the Su_Spence office -
MTF? Yes much! - P2