[Peetwo]

Tabled Docs & Supp submissions??

Via GA Inquiry webpages: 

To begin I note that the Angel Flight submission has been mysteriously taken down?? So in case you missed this excellent, fact based and clinical document I managed to crib a copy when I got notified of it's existence on the morning of the hearing - see HERE.  

Next I note that today Su_Spence has tabled her opening statement, which in retrospect the veracity (after the performance of her and her executive cronies in that hearing, plus in evidence provided by Angel Flight) of which is absolutely laughable...  -  see HERE. 

Then there was the (un-notified) additions to the AMROBA submissions: https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/...tion-2.pdf & https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/...dendum.pdf

The 2nd one calls into question the motives of the new ABC AFTIA in their presentation to the Senate Committee:

Hmm...well said that MAN! 

While on the subject of AFTIA I note that EWH did a piece on their inquiry appearance: http://www.australianflying.com.au/lates...-ga-pilots

This is what EWH said on FB to promote that piece:

Apprentice pilots! This scheme would take a lot of regulatory massaging, but it seems to have some support from the outset. What do you think? Is this the solution to GA sustainability? http://www.australianflying.com.au/.../aftia-proposes...

Hmmm...definitely much, much MTF...P2 

ps I note that EWH also did a piece on the Kingston evidence: http://www.australianflying.com.au/lates...e-rejected ...but to this point in time has not made any mention of the incisive evidence provided by Angel Flight (with strong evidence of CASA contempt for the Senate) and the consequential diabolical performance of CASA that followed?? - UDB!