08-06-2021, 08:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-06-2021, 08:38 AM by thorn bird.)
Geez, being in home detention sets the mind to ponder. Why oh why do the little birds fly?
Just why does Australia require such convoluted, expensive, industry destroying regulation?
CASA maintains it is necessary for the "Safety" of aviation, the only thing their charter says they must consider.
Therefore to protect the Australian public from raining aluminium they must have complex regulation like no other in the developed world.
Which brings to mind, if complex regulation is the only way to protect the Australian public from raining aluminium,
Why are foreign aircraft, who's regulators have less onerous less complex regulation, permitted to fly into and out of Australia. Surely they are a risk to the safety of the Australian public?
Heard a rumour that CASA is attempting to influence ICAO around to their way of thinking.
Good luck with that, other countries actually value their industries.
Just why does Australia require such convoluted, expensive, industry destroying regulation?
CASA maintains it is necessary for the "Safety" of aviation, the only thing their charter says they must consider.
Therefore to protect the Australian public from raining aluminium they must have complex regulation like no other in the developed world.
Which brings to mind, if complex regulation is the only way to protect the Australian public from raining aluminium,
Why are foreign aircraft, who's regulators have less onerous less complex regulation, permitted to fly into and out of Australia. Surely they are a risk to the safety of the Australian public?
Heard a rumour that CASA is attempting to influence ICAO around to their way of thinking.
Good luck with that, other countries actually value their industries.