[Peetwo]

The Scot Git - Man at the back of the room?? 

Hansard extract: 

"...I would make the point, and I can back this up, that Mr Buckley indicated that the transition from one team to another was the beginning of the change. A number of senators have referred to that. I won't refer to the team leader's name, who has since left the organisation. What I will tell you is that the team leader applied repeatedly from 2015 to 2018 to be removed from the supervision of Mr Buckley's case because he felt that his team was wilting under the demands and behaviours of Mr Buckley and he felt that his team was captured. So he went to his supervisor and asked that Mr Buckley's matter be allocated to another team, and it was allocated to another team, and it was looked at a lot harder. Now, the fact is that Mr Buckley will say that he had a very pleasant journey with CASA employees over a number of years designing his future. The CASA employees didn't quite see it that way. The CASA employees got to the end of that process and felt that they were not delivering the right outcome, and they asked to be removed from that..."

Now in pictures listen while keeping your eye on the 'man at the back of the room'...

You're now probably thinking that I've lost my marbles (I know too late for that -  ) but there is a point when you consider the following extracts from this PDF file: GB16 GRAEME CRAWFORD 16 of 18

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Also consider the email correspondence between the 'team leader' and GB within the period mentioned by the former DAS (patron Saint of Australian Aviation Safety) St Carmodious:

"..What I will tell you is that the team leader applied repeatedly from 2015 to 2018 to be removed from the supervision of Mr Buckley's case because he felt that his team was wilting under the demands and behaviours of Mr Buckley and he felt that his team was captured..."

Ref: GB8 JOHN COSTA 8 OF 18

Q1/ Now with all of that in mind wouldn't you have thought, that given Crawford's position as topdog of all flight inspectorate staff, that if there was any truth to the St Carmodious allegations then he would have conveyed those concerns with at least some mild form of rebuke to GB?

Q2/ If there was/or wasn't any truth to the St Carmodious allegations, wasn't Crawford obliged to either back up/or correct the record while being in attendance as a witness to the Senate GA inquiry?

MTF...P2