Precedent and Judges.
Google “stare decisis”
"1- the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.
"a doctrine of stare decisis"
And the reason for the huge, expensive appeal become crystal clear. Then, consider carefully the remarks of Justice Monika Schmidt which allowed Pel-Air legal team to argue “erred in her ruling”. In short, the door was left open for an appeal, enter the dragon.
Once, I heard a judge wrap up a case, where the chance of ‘appeal’ was very real. The closing remarks were lengthy as this wily gentleman carefully, but oh so thoroughly shut out that chance. It was IMO a brilliant piece of work and a valuable lesson to me at least on ‘how’ the law can work both for and against either side of an argument.
"This is a court of law, young man, not a court of justice". ~ Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Toot – fingers crossed – toot.
Google “stare decisis”
"1- the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.
"a doctrine of stare decisis"
And the reason for the huge, expensive appeal become crystal clear. Then, consider carefully the remarks of Justice Monika Schmidt which allowed Pel-Air legal team to argue “erred in her ruling”. In short, the door was left open for an appeal, enter the dragon.
Once, I heard a judge wrap up a case, where the chance of ‘appeal’ was very real. The closing remarks were lengthy as this wily gentleman carefully, but oh so thoroughly shut out that chance. It was IMO a brilliant piece of work and a valuable lesson to me at least on ‘how’ the law can work both for and against either side of an argument.
"This is a court of law, young man, not a court of justice". ~ Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Toot – fingers crossed – toot.