06-20-2018, 06:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2018, 07:41 PM by thorn bird.)
To true Gobbles, coming to an airport near you as well, everyone should
start to learn Mandarin or at least "singlish".
Now we know our Primary Airports are not permitted to be owned by a foreign entity, according to the Airports Act.
So how come the head lease holder on KS Sydney resides in the Bahamas?
We all know that the Airports act reserved secondary Airports for aviation use, much like our National Parks are reserved
for recreational use. It was also not allowed for property sharks to own leases on these airports.
Passing strange how much non aviation commercial development is planned or completed at secondary Airports, even down to closing runways and other Airport facilities to facilitate commercial development, and we thought the head leases said the airports must be retained and maintained in their original condition.
Almost two thirds of BK airport is at threat for Non Aviation commercial development.
It is also illegal according to the Act for a trust to own an airport.
Is a superannuation fund not a trust?
A development shark in the gun for a secondary airport development modus operandi, was to develop regardless, apologise
profusely when caught out in breach, pay a insignificant fine, then get on with making their millions because their project was so far advanced it was impossible to stop it. Anyone complain? Those that tried hauled into court until they ran out of money.
A few hundred thousand into a politicians election fund quickly soothed any political opposition.
start to learn Mandarin or at least "singlish".
Now we know our Primary Airports are not permitted to be owned by a foreign entity, according to the Airports Act.
So how come the head lease holder on KS Sydney resides in the Bahamas?
We all know that the Airports act reserved secondary Airports for aviation use, much like our National Parks are reserved
for recreational use. It was also not allowed for property sharks to own leases on these airports.
Passing strange how much non aviation commercial development is planned or completed at secondary Airports, even down to closing runways and other Airport facilities to facilitate commercial development, and we thought the head leases said the airports must be retained and maintained in their original condition.
Almost two thirds of BK airport is at threat for Non Aviation commercial development.
It is also illegal according to the Act for a trust to own an airport.
Is a superannuation fund not a trust?
A development shark in the gun for a secondary airport development modus operandi, was to develop regardless, apologise
profusely when caught out in breach, pay a insignificant fine, then get on with making their millions because their project was so far advanced it was impossible to stop it. Anyone complain? Those that tried hauled into court until they ran out of money.
A few hundred thousand into a politicians election fund quickly soothed any political opposition.