Smoking enema’s & the pinning of fart to the wall; 101.
I expect lots and lots of folk are wondering what the upshot of our digging about in the bowels of Australia’s alleged compliance with ICAO is. There is (almost literally) a mile of solid research to wade through; certainly a ream and it would be understandable if it gave you a headache. However, you cannot call Bollocks without evidence; hence the digging about. “Too much here to read in one hit” was the consensus. Clearly defined conclusions are difficult to draw –from cleverly, we believe, deliberately obscured to sooth political concerns. How to encapsulate it all – put in a nutshell – is problematic as the thing is so nebulous, it almost defies this practical application. Not only that, but to keep a short statement ‘accurate’ and on target through the smoke and mirrors is fraught with the perils of relying on malleable facts. However, to begin at the end:- with the now infamous O’Sofullame Freudian slip.
Hansard - “The FAA has done an audit on CASA in Australia. I understand it's going to be interesting reading.”
"Many are wondering why the government is sitting on the last ICAO/FAA audit: indeed to quote O’Sofullame - “I understand it's going to be interesting reading. They're resisting publication of that at the moment. We're trying to muddle our way through getting that out into the open.”
WTD - “resisting releasing it”. Who or what is resisting and why FDS are 'they' allowed. by the Chair, to get away with it? Bollocks.
P2 – “Depicted in the Creedy puff piece was this graph of the EI 'effective implementation' of ICAO standards by Australia compared to the global average (below):”
P2 – “However to be fair to CC (or not - ) when you read the blurb on the ICAO adopted USOAP CMA it becomes obvious that the EI graph is constantly being updated as an individual State reviews or updates and self-assesses through SAAQs, EFOD, CAPs (ref pg 1) and PQs (pg 2):”
“..The process of notification of differences provides a structured way for each State to communicate its aviation rules by measuring itself against the neutral framework of the ICAO standards…
For the benefit of those intellectually challenged – lets all repeat this sentence; once again. When you have committed it to memory – repeat it: often, to everyone you meet who may want to buy a large bridge which my pyramid company has been asked to dispose of.
“by measuring itself against the neutral framework of the ICAO standards”.
Toot & Spin – Toot & Spin – I’m so dizzy – I may even vomit, copiously.
I expect lots and lots of folk are wondering what the upshot of our digging about in the bowels of Australia’s alleged compliance with ICAO is. There is (almost literally) a mile of solid research to wade through; certainly a ream and it would be understandable if it gave you a headache. However, you cannot call Bollocks without evidence; hence the digging about. “Too much here to read in one hit” was the consensus. Clearly defined conclusions are difficult to draw –from cleverly, we believe, deliberately obscured to sooth political concerns. How to encapsulate it all – put in a nutshell – is problematic as the thing is so nebulous, it almost defies this practical application. Not only that, but to keep a short statement ‘accurate’ and on target through the smoke and mirrors is fraught with the perils of relying on malleable facts. However, to begin at the end:- with the now infamous O’Sofullame Freudian slip.
Hansard - “The FAA has done an audit on CASA in Australia. I understand it's going to be interesting reading.”
"Many are wondering why the government is sitting on the last ICAO/FAA audit: indeed to quote O’Sofullame - “I understand it's going to be interesting reading. They're resisting publication of that at the moment. We're trying to muddle our way through getting that out into the open.”
WTD - “resisting releasing it”. Who or what is resisting and why FDS are 'they' allowed. by the Chair, to get away with it? Bollocks.
P2 – “Depicted in the Creedy puff piece was this graph of the EI 'effective implementation' of ICAO standards by Australia compared to the global average (below):”
P2 – “However to be fair to CC (or not - ) when you read the blurb on the ICAO adopted USOAP CMA it becomes obvious that the EI graph is constantly being updated as an individual State reviews or updates and self-assesses through SAAQs, EFOD, CAPs (ref pg 1) and PQs (pg 2):”
“..The process of notification of differences provides a structured way for each State to communicate its aviation rules by measuring itself against the neutral framework of the ICAO standards…
For the benefit of those intellectually challenged – lets all repeat this sentence; once again. When you have committed it to memory – repeat it: often, to everyone you meet who may want to buy a large bridge which my pyramid company has been asked to dispose of.
“by measuring itself against the neutral framework of the ICAO standards”.
Toot & Spin – Toot & Spin – I’m so dizzy – I may even vomit, copiously.