[Peetwo]

MH370 & truth prevailing - maybe??

Malaysia has finally answered a request to release the unredacted satellite logs for #MH370. Details here.
http://mh370.radiantphysics.com/ 

I imagine that time and some pretty thorough analysis will determine whether the INMARSAT data forwarded to Victor Ianello and the IG crew is genuine and/or helpful or not?

Via Victor's blog:

The Unredacted Inmarsat Satellite Data for MH370
by Victor Iannello
POSTED: MONDAY, 6/12/2017

Inmarsat’s Mark Dickinson holding the satellite data in an interview with CNN

Since we first learned of its existence, we’ve been asking for the complete record of the communications data between MH370 and Inmarsat’s satellite network. In May 2014, Malaysia released satellite data logs, but they were incomplete: fields of data were missing, and only a small number of data records from before the flight was made available. When pressed for the complete logs, Inmarsat and Malaysia both claimed the data had to be released by the other.

We now have what we believe is the complete record of communications between airframe 9M-MRO and the Inmarsat satellite network, from March 7, 2014, at 00:51 UTC, until March 8, 2014, at 01:16 UTC. This time period includes the previous flight from Beijing to Kuala Lumpur.

The satellite data was shared with me by a relative of a Chinese passenger on MH370. The data was given to him by Malaysia Airlines with the following email text:

Please find attached the Inmarsat data, for your info. Please note that these are raw data as you have requested. The authorities agree to release the data, on condition that:

1. We will not translate the data into any meaningful information as the data is proprietary to Inmarsat. The Malaysian Investigation team does not have any experts to translate these data into any meaningful information.
   
2. We will not translate the data into any other language, including Mandarin.
   
3. These data are complete and obtained from Inmarsat. Please do not manipulate the data.
   

[size=undefined]
I know, by having these data, you will have more questions, but I have to say that we are providing these data to satisfy your request, but we cannot answer any questions on the data because we too, cannot understand it. Only the experts from Inmarsat can.
 Hope you understand.
 Thank you

I suspect the data will confirm some assumptions, and will raise even more questions. I hope the data can help us learn more about the disappearance.

This entry was posted on Monday, June 12th, 2017 at 10:59 am and is filed under Aviation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.[/size]

  
And Mike Exner wasted no time in getting down to business   :

First look at the complete Inmarsat Logs

Michael Exner

June 12, 2017

I have been looking at the new (complete) Inmarsat Log File. So far, I have not discovered anything to suggest that the May 2014 redacted log file had any material errors or changes. As VI noted, the new data covers the previous flight, and it includes all the columns. Having the receive power and C/N0 data for both flights is especially helpful.

I note the following:

1. All MH370 transmissions were via the IOR s/c (as previously reported).

2. All MH370 transmissions were via the High Gain Antenna (as previously reported).

3. There were no CRC errors on any transmission (thus, 0 or low BER).

4. The value of C/N0 at 18:25:27 was 15 dB lower than nominal. All the other MH370 C/N0 values were nominal or close to nominal, including the one 7 seconds later.

5. A 15 dB low C/N0 anomaly occurred 3 times during the previous flight.

6. The C/N0 value at 00:19:29 was 6 dB lower than nominal, but so were 3 other transmissions between 16:00 and 16:07 while MH370 was on the ground.

7. Of the 4 low C/N0 anomalous values, 3 happened on the previous flight and 1 happened during MH370. They occurred on both R600 and R1200 channels, and via both the IOR and POR s/c.

8. In all cases of low C/N0, the receive power (70 MHz IF power in FDMA channel) was nominal. That means the demods detected higher than normal noise, not low signal strength. This could be due to real "noise" (like, adjacent channel interference, adjacent satellite co-channel interference, etc.). However, it could also be due to CU demod measurement error. Such estimate errors should be expected to occur rarely, as observed here.

Thus, there is nothing to suggest these low C/N0 transmissions were caused by aircraft maneuvering or unusual attitudes. In all four cases of a 15 dB low C/N0 between March 7 at 01:00 and March 8 at 02:00, the values of C/N0 were nominal a few seconds before and after, so it does not appear to be due to anything unusual happening at 18:25:27 or 00:19:29.

One can only hope that the worm has finally turned and the disinfo crew has lost interest and knocked off...


MTF...P2

Ps Also for those interested PT's take on this latest development:

Missing MH370 satellite data released, doesn't contain surprises

Shared by
Ben Sandilands
[/url]

• Buffer
  
• Google+
  
• LinkedIn
  
• Email
  

A key element in some conspiracy theories about the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 can be dismissed following the release of all of the data generated between the Boeing 777 and an...

[url=https://twitter.com/PlaneTalking]