04-21-2017, 11:45 PM
@ventus45
A question for you, where i have not seen a solid answer - hope i have just missed it:
Still turning around 1707 utc last ACARS, and 1825 the mysterious re-log on of the plane´s system.
In this presentation, kindly tweeted by ALSM, for NoK in China by Annex 13 team, Yesterday,
https://twitter.com/Airlandseaman/status...4838160385
on page 18 - we find again the satcom activities, including the 1707/1825 gap.
If these are the satcom activities i do not understand why the GES did NOT interrogate the plane´s system, if it is still online - because i have never seen something else than the GES would interrogate in an interval of 1 hour or 1 hour +/- 256 seconds. So after 1707 an interrogation was due at 1807 (or 1803 or 1811).
Some have argued that the text message from MAS ops at 1803 may have interrupted it - but if the official list of satcom activities, 3 years later, still has nothing to offer after 1707, then i am lost why the GES did not do what it shall be designed to do.
Do You have an explanation for this?
Thanks a lot for Your time.
Curtis
A question for you, where i have not seen a solid answer - hope i have just missed it:
Still turning around 1707 utc last ACARS, and 1825 the mysterious re-log on of the plane´s system.
In this presentation, kindly tweeted by ALSM, for NoK in China by Annex 13 team, Yesterday,
https://twitter.com/Airlandseaman/status...4838160385
on page 18 - we find again the satcom activities, including the 1707/1825 gap.
If these are the satcom activities i do not understand why the GES did NOT interrogate the plane´s system, if it is still online - because i have never seen something else than the GES would interrogate in an interval of 1 hour or 1 hour +/- 256 seconds. So after 1707 an interrogation was due at 1807 (or 1803 or 1811).
Some have argued that the text message from MAS ops at 1803 may have interrupted it - but if the official list of satcom activities, 3 years later, still has nothing to offer after 1707, then i am lost why the GES did not do what it shall be designed to do.
Do You have an explanation for this?
Thanks a lot for Your time.
Curtis