02-10-2017, 03:05 PM
Well good luck everybody but without a change to the Act wherein there is at least some word about the advancement of aviation (as in the USA), or some direction regarding the health of the industry, then little will change.
Everyone and anyone in Aviation House only has to say "safety" to justify the continuance of the status quo. From the top managers down to the tea lady they all know about it, all the cushy jobs and mighty pay packets rely on maintaining the current edifice no matter what.
In other words to rely on a personality to make the changes that are needed is to be clutching at straws, and will see hopes dashed yet again.
Only with Parliamentary backing, that is political willpower, can there be any hope of overcoming the continuing degeneration of General Aviation. How we achieve that is the big question, and it will not happen without work and publicity at many levels.
Everyone and anyone in Aviation House only has to say "safety" to justify the continuance of the status quo. From the top managers down to the tea lady they all know about it, all the cushy jobs and mighty pay packets rely on maintaining the current edifice no matter what.
In other words to rely on a personality to make the changes that are needed is to be clutching at straws, and will see hopes dashed yet again.
Only with Parliamentary backing, that is political willpower, can there be any hope of overcoming the continuing degeneration of General Aviation. How we achieve that is the big question, and it will not happen without work and publicity at many levels.