08-22-2016, 07:13 AM
Speaking from a purely mathematical perspective; I can, without hesitation, confirm the Thorny calculations are correct. Furthermore; his assessment of the applied formulae are accurate, except in the Casorwellian discipline, there is no requirement to resolve the vexed question of two+ two.
That equation is a reverse onus conundrum where the answer (four) is provided but a random number set is the question; you must, no matter how, reduce the random elements to the required, preordained result. The art form is in shuffling the numbers to loose the inconvenient ones, those which bugger up mathematical logic and fudge the rest so that it looks very much like a real result. Simple enough, and demonstrates the requisite ability to cheat, lie and get away with it.
Those with integrity and a pawky sensaumor have no chance. That rules you and your lamp-shade out of the through dwellers examination mate. Nice one-
Toot – LOL – toot.
That equation is a reverse onus conundrum where the answer (four) is provided but a random number set is the question; you must, no matter how, reduce the random elements to the required, preordained result. The art form is in shuffling the numbers to loose the inconvenient ones, those which bugger up mathematical logic and fudge the rest so that it looks very much like a real result. Simple enough, and demonstrates the requisite ability to cheat, lie and get away with it.
Those with integrity and a pawky sensaumor have no chance. That rules you and your lamp-shade out of the through dwellers examination mate. Nice one-
Toot – LOL – toot.