[ventus45]

Q.  Time to think of it as a criminal act ?
A.  Yes Indeed.
Q.  Who is the criminal - the pilot ?
A.  Perhaps.
Q.  Perhaps - if not - who ?
A.  That - is a very interesting question.
Q.  Really - and the answer is ..... ?
A.  ....................................




Ron's post on Jeff Wise.net post at July 23, 2016 at 1:48 PM is significant, and worth a look.




His takeaway: This is the professional fingerprint of intelligence agencies ....
It could turn out to be seminal.

I think that we need to stop, and go back to square one.
We need to have a serious re-think - from day 1.

We need to look back over the last 2 plus years at the history of the "official" information.

If you do, the only conclusion that you can come to, is that "we have been played" by the "intelligence agencies", into "beleiving" the SIO narative.

The early roumors, way back, of a flight "to a short runway, on a remote island, in the Southern Indian Ocean", is, and always was, quite clearly, pure garbage.
There is no such island, as we all know.

But, for the gullible, there are four ("stretching credulity to the limit") possibilities.

One, the fictional "Commonwealth of New Island", which is supposedly at 35S 100E, which does not fit "any" of the "other" so called "official information", but wonder of wonders, our new "red track" from these new "five data points" neatly overflys. Yeah rite !

Two, the Christmas Island theory, which is also garbage, in my frank opinion (no offence to those who developed it).

Three, Cocos Island (which was never in the game / frame).

Four, the Amsterdam / Saint Paul Islands (which don't have any airstrip of any kind) except a helo pad.

I have, like others, have worked long and hard on my own theory of a deliberate ditch in the SIO.
I still beleive it is correct, IFF (If and ONLY If) the Inmarsat pings, are legitimate.
If they are not legitimate, all bets are off.

The "debris", and the "drift studies" are slowly convincing me, that "something is rotten in the state of Denmark".

It is time to seriously question, the efficasy of the entire, "radar at 18:22" matching the "ping at 18:25" story. It is just "way too convenient", and always has been, (as others have of course pointed out in the past).

They could both be legitimate signals of course, in that those "radar returns" and the "pings" could have been generated from a real aircraft.
But those "sporadic" radar returns in the Interim Factual "were not generated by a B777 - which has a HUGE RCS", they WERE NOT MH370.
The "pings" on the other hand, could have been generated on board ANY aircraft with the necessary equipment and codes, drone or not.
Indeed, the "signal source" does not even have to be an aircraft. Those signals "could" have been generated quite easily by "someone" with the necessary codes and equipment, from any point within the 19:40 ping ring 3F-1 footprint.
That opens a can of worms, that only a very few, very shadowy creatures can play in.
.
Put bluntly, I now think Ron is probably correct.
"This is the professional fingerprint of intelligence agencies ...."

I am, more and more, leaning to the thought, that we have been "conned" by the intelligence agencies, all along, ie, that "both" the 18:22 radar hit, and the entire Isat log, are "electronically real", but are in fact A DELIBERATE DECEPTION.

I have long harboured an alternative view, that the aircraft never went west from Igari at all.
It never went over Malaysia, nor over or around the northern tip of Sumatrata, let alone south, deep into the SIO.

It went EAST, into the Pacific, towards an intended landing at a "remote island" with a "short runway".
To the Yap Islands, specifically, to Fais at 09 46.26N 140 31.15E.



Alternatively, it might have been planned to go to SE from BAHAR to Manus Island rather than NE to Yap Island .  After all, "Detention Facilities" are already "in-being", managed by a third, suitably "compliant state", on Manus Island.  "Pacific Solutions" are "Pacific Solutions" after all !! Just saying !!



But, MH370 never made it to Fais (or Manus Island).

MH370 was not an aircraft systems accident, nor was it a pilot suicide.

MH370 was a "double hijack disaster", the result of a high stakes game of international espionage and counter espionage.

The first hijack was between Igari and Bitod, where one side took the plane to "snatch back" some people who knew "too much", and who could not be "allowed" to "reach destination".
All went according to plan - flying east - for some time.

But eventually, "the escorting minders" of "the unsuspecting snatched", realized that they had been thwarted.
They launched a "counter hijack".

In the ensuing battle, it all went terribly wrong, for both sides, and the innocent passengers and crew, and the aircraft crashed.

The crash was not in the SIO, nor was it in the SCS, it was way east of there, at 4 degrees north, between waypoint MOLLY and waypoint BAHAR.





The "French held flaperon" has been locked up, under the cloak of a "Terrorist Investigation".
Why ?
Because it has "Pacific Ocean Barnacles", not "Indian Ocean Barnacles".

Crash_zone_between_Molly_and_Bahar_.JPG Size: 235.87 KB  Downloads: 153

MH370-Hijack-Flight-Plan.JPG Size: 469.2 KB  Downloads: 126