05-19-2016, 06:51 AM
[quote pid='4315' dateline='1463566078']
Tom Lindsay
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
MTF...P2![Tongue Tongue](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
==========
Just a caution from Chillit. Far as I know, Twitter scrubs all Exif data off of each and every image posted to a Timeline. In any event, the absence of Exif data may not mean much, and this can almost certainly be traced back through the guy who reported it and is on record as having found it: Neels Kruger. Don't have his address, but Jeff may.
The only part that got my attention the first time I saw it was the striated sand on the lower part of the picture. Looks like it was recently raked. Why? Just presentation, or is there more to it. Personally not concerned about impropriety, but would like to know more. Is it in a quiet bay? How much wave action is there? Was it found between tides, or was it far enough up the beach to be out of the tide zone? What were weather conditions around that time if anyone knows. Just contextual things for me.
[/quote]
Tom Lindsay
Quote:Posted May 18, 2016 at 12:59 AMPersonally I hope the photo is ridgy, didge and did turn up 3 months before to simply be washed out to sea again...
Hi All
Have checked out this pic (RR) with some very good software, which I use on a daily basis. Not one sign of any Exif/meta data to be seen. NOT one. Clean as a whistle. My opinion – looks staged.
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
MTF...P2
![Tongue Tongue](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
==========
Just a caution from Chillit. Far as I know, Twitter scrubs all Exif data off of each and every image posted to a Timeline. In any event, the absence of Exif data may not mean much, and this can almost certainly be traced back through the guy who reported it and is on record as having found it: Neels Kruger. Don't have his address, but Jeff may.
The only part that got my attention the first time I saw it was the striated sand on the lower part of the picture. Looks like it was recently raked. Why? Just presentation, or is there more to it. Personally not concerned about impropriety, but would like to know more. Is it in a quiet bay? How much wave action is there? Was it found between tides, or was it far enough up the beach to be out of the tide zone? What were weather conditions around that time if anyone knows. Just contextual things for me.
[/quote]