Less than 15,000 km^2 to go (since MORE THAN 105,000 of the 120,000 km^2 is done) per JACC MH370 Operational Search Update of 04 May 2016. (http://jacc.gov.au/families/operational_...60504.aspx)
The Federal Budget has provided no further funding for continuing search efforts next FY (beyond end June) other than providing $19.4 million per year after July, presumably, just to keep the JACC PR machine on standby.
None of this is any surprise of course. The government has consistently stated that the search will end when the 120,000 km^2 is completed.
The so called "professional forensic analysis" of the so called "debris" has produced way too many "holes" in logic to be credible. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the "finds" have been orchestrated - by someone.
Since that is now more than likely, we have to go back and very seriously re-consider the integrity of the Inmarsat data.
Much has been written about the possibility of spoofing, and Inmarsat themselves did openly state early on, that they were concerned, that they may have been. Those concerns seem to have "slipped away into the night" without any solid explanation. But since the release of the "redacted log" however, the media, and the internet crowd in general, and the IG in particular, have effectively accepted it as "an article of faith".
Has that faith been misplaced ?
The fact that so much of the Inmarsat Log was "redacted", in a case like this, is cause for a serious re-examination of that faith, and its "teachings" (so-to-speak).
Thus, to my mind, since the entire SIO theory / search is dependent on that "faith", which may be seriously misplaced, that it is becoming increasingly likely, that MH-370 never flew into the SIO at all.
Which means, (obviously) that it went somewhere else, and thus, to put it bluntly, someone took it there.
Which means, it was a criminal act, by someone.
There were six Australian Citizens on board MH-370, who came from NSW and Queensland, and one Permanent Resident who came from Western Australia.
Unlike in the case of MH-17, (which was clearly the result of a criminal act) it is interesting that none of the legal authorities (Federal Police, three State Police Forces, and three State Coroners) seem interested in investigating their deaths.
I wonder why ?
The Federal Budget has provided no further funding for continuing search efforts next FY (beyond end June) other than providing $19.4 million per year after July, presumably, just to keep the JACC PR machine on standby.
None of this is any surprise of course. The government has consistently stated that the search will end when the 120,000 km^2 is completed.
The so called "professional forensic analysis" of the so called "debris" has produced way too many "holes" in logic to be credible. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the "finds" have been orchestrated - by someone.
Since that is now more than likely, we have to go back and very seriously re-consider the integrity of the Inmarsat data.
Much has been written about the possibility of spoofing, and Inmarsat themselves did openly state early on, that they were concerned, that they may have been. Those concerns seem to have "slipped away into the night" without any solid explanation. But since the release of the "redacted log" however, the media, and the internet crowd in general, and the IG in particular, have effectively accepted it as "an article of faith".
Has that faith been misplaced ?
The fact that so much of the Inmarsat Log was "redacted", in a case like this, is cause for a serious re-examination of that faith, and its "teachings" (so-to-speak).
Thus, to my mind, since the entire SIO theory / search is dependent on that "faith", which may be seriously misplaced, that it is becoming increasingly likely, that MH-370 never flew into the SIO at all.
Which means, (obviously) that it went somewhere else, and thus, to put it bluntly, someone took it there.
Which means, it was a criminal act, by someone.
There were six Australian Citizens on board MH-370, who came from NSW and Queensland, and one Permanent Resident who came from Western Australia.
Unlike in the case of MH-17, (which was clearly the result of a criminal act) it is interesting that none of the legal authorities (Federal Police, three State Police Forces, and three State Coroners) seem interested in investigating their deaths.
I wonder why ?