08-07-2015, 01:04 PM
Herr Ventus;
"It was a cover up, you do not lose a B777 without a trace".
Absolutely correct. I've said this all along. There is no way that the Yanks or Chinese missed this event. Someone has satellite detail of where she went down. Unfortunately they don't want to admit to 'looking' from on high at areas they shouldn't be looking at, and probably using equipment they don't want us to know about. Several previous Yank rocket launches and former shuttle missions were done in a very secretive manner when it came to disclosing what the payload was that they were carrying and why and what they were going to use it for. "Out of sight and out of mind" more like it, space a giant vacumn in which it is easy to hide things from prying earthling eyes!
As for flotsam and the theory that the aircraft sunk in almost one piece - bullshit. People need to analyse prevailing weather conditions at the time and probable location that she contacted the water. Even if she was 'gliding' she would have contacted large waves out there at perhaps 300 km/h (all assumptions) at night, and she would've been broken apart. Maybe there were some big pieces, true, but she would've been ripped apart. She didn't land on the Hudson in the day time and glide from a low altitude. Very big differences here.
Then again WTF would I know, we need to ask that 'font of all things aviation knowledge' Beaker what happened.
"It was a cover up, you do not lose a B777 without a trace".
Absolutely correct. I've said this all along. There is no way that the Yanks or Chinese missed this event. Someone has satellite detail of where she went down. Unfortunately they don't want to admit to 'looking' from on high at areas they shouldn't be looking at, and probably using equipment they don't want us to know about. Several previous Yank rocket launches and former shuttle missions were done in a very secretive manner when it came to disclosing what the payload was that they were carrying and why and what they were going to use it for. "Out of sight and out of mind" more like it, space a giant vacumn in which it is easy to hide things from prying earthling eyes!
As for flotsam and the theory that the aircraft sunk in almost one piece - bullshit. People need to analyse prevailing weather conditions at the time and probable location that she contacted the water. Even if she was 'gliding' she would have contacted large waves out there at perhaps 300 km/h (all assumptions) at night, and she would've been broken apart. Maybe there were some big pieces, true, but she would've been ripped apart. She didn't land on the Hudson in the day time and glide from a low altitude. Very big differences here.
Then again WTF would I know, we need to ask that 'font of all things aviation knowledge' Beaker what happened.