08-07-2015, 01:58 AM
Even if the jagged tearing along the thinnest edge is due to flutter induced stress and signs of high speed, there is nothing to prove it had anything to do with that 7th arc. Could have happened further south after MH370 flew through the 7th arc. Similar tears were seen in the MH17 wreckage, so it seems possible impact with the water or something else could also cause that sort of damage.
And if MH370 did conveniently drop on that 7th arc, why is it all those ships chasing false BB pings further north, and the planes still doing a surface search never saw any debris? It is not impossible they missed it, it might have already moved out of the search area, but when they do the drift models it would be nice if they did it with no preconceived notion it started on the 7th arc. They are meant to be working out a probable starting point. Not pinning the donkeys tail on the 7th arc, we already had all the mathematicians doing that.
And if MH370 did conveniently drop on that 7th arc, why is it all those ships chasing false BB pings further north, and the planes still doing a surface search never saw any debris? It is not impossible they missed it, it might have already moved out of the search area, but when they do the drift models it would be nice if they did it with no preconceived notion it started on the 7th arc. They are meant to be working out a probable starting point. Not pinning the donkeys tail on the 7th arc, we already had all the mathematicians doing that.