Timing and simple arithmetic.
In the latest offering from Buckley – HERE – (long read) there are, without doubt, some valid points raised. One point of interest is the referral to the 'Robodebt' bun fight, which ended needing a Royal Commission to sort out. Should you have a few spare, idle moments, 'Google' that one word, then roll down the page and count the number of government agencies who have 'published' reports related to the event , on the first page; then seek out 'independent' commentary on same. They exist, but you need to look to find 'em.
The RC into Robodebt, in essence, happened because of the sheer weight of numbers involved and (of course) the dollars and, by extension votes. It was a matter of public interest therefore it became a matter of political interest (just a bit) and it cost millions of tax payer dollars (lots of) up front. Behind the 'spend' there was another impost; government employees hired to do 'other' work were seconded to the 'defence' - which left primary work on the desk.
In short, it was an expensive operation in time, money and productivity loss. It begs the question; can one person raise the ante to a level where the government de jour would feel inclined to invest in another Royal Commission on the grounds that Buckley has been 'unfairly treated'. The odds are not good; indeed, a better bet would be that every effort is made to keep the lid firmly fastened on this small can 'o worms. Even if the genie got out of the bottle, look back no further into history than the 'Pel-Air' final report from a Senate inquiry to gauge the 'real' changes effected. Does Buckley have a cat in Hell's chance of a RC?
Short answer, no. Long answer NO ducking way.
And yet – IMO – there exists a slim chance; a long shot, probably in the mission impossible class, but worth a thought or two. Consider; If, big one (huge) Buckley was a 'one off' – the only aviation business operator, pilot, aircraft owner, or maintenance organisation that had been 'handled' by CASA then we could all say Buckley was a rogue operator and CASA have done well to weed him out of the game. Amen and good-night Vienna.
But he ain't Robinson Crusoe is he? No by a long march he ain't. Standing alone, pilloried, he 'don't signify'. IF; collectively, from Qantas down to Joe Blog's flying academy in Kickinatinalong, to the Wup-Whoop spanner twister academy, there was cohesive, collective shout for real reform and ICAO standard of governance; then perhaps, just maybe, there would be hope, not only for Buckley but for this nation's aviation businesses. Gods know, it is desperately needed. No bets taken; the 'book' is locked away...
There, my two bob, spent as pleased me best..Toot toot..
In the latest offering from Buckley – HERE – (long read) there are, without doubt, some valid points raised. One point of interest is the referral to the 'Robodebt' bun fight, which ended needing a Royal Commission to sort out. Should you have a few spare, idle moments, 'Google' that one word, then roll down the page and count the number of government agencies who have 'published' reports related to the event , on the first page; then seek out 'independent' commentary on same. They exist, but you need to look to find 'em.
The RC into Robodebt, in essence, happened because of the sheer weight of numbers involved and (of course) the dollars and, by extension votes. It was a matter of public interest therefore it became a matter of political interest (just a bit) and it cost millions of tax payer dollars (lots of) up front. Behind the 'spend' there was another impost; government employees hired to do 'other' work were seconded to the 'defence' - which left primary work on the desk.
In short, it was an expensive operation in time, money and productivity loss. It begs the question; can one person raise the ante to a level where the government de jour would feel inclined to invest in another Royal Commission on the grounds that Buckley has been 'unfairly treated'. The odds are not good; indeed, a better bet would be that every effort is made to keep the lid firmly fastened on this small can 'o worms. Even if the genie got out of the bottle, look back no further into history than the 'Pel-Air' final report from a Senate inquiry to gauge the 'real' changes effected. Does Buckley have a cat in Hell's chance of a RC?
Short answer, no. Long answer NO ducking way.
And yet – IMO – there exists a slim chance; a long shot, probably in the mission impossible class, but worth a thought or two. Consider; If, big one (huge) Buckley was a 'one off' – the only aviation business operator, pilot, aircraft owner, or maintenance organisation that had been 'handled' by CASA then we could all say Buckley was a rogue operator and CASA have done well to weed him out of the game. Amen and good-night Vienna.
But he ain't Robinson Crusoe is he? No by a long march he ain't. Standing alone, pilloried, he 'don't signify'. IF; collectively, from Qantas down to Joe Blog's flying academy in Kickinatinalong, to the Wup-Whoop spanner twister academy, there was cohesive, collective shout for real reform and ICAO standard of governance; then perhaps, just maybe, there would be hope, not only for Buckley but for this nation's aviation businesses. Gods know, it is desperately needed. No bets taken; the 'book' is locked away...
There, my two bob, spent as pleased me best..Toot toot..