07-14-2015, 07:23 PM
"Airservices did not directly answer the question when contacted by The Australian but insisted the system did work to ground level, despite not being accepted by CASA as sufficiently reliable in Hobart"
Of course they didn't. They would have had to scurry away and formulate some bullshit response. And of course don't forget that Anus 'turtle' Houston would have pulled his head in and hidden like he always does when the hard questions are asked.
The bearded Pinocchio said;
"Asked if this was due to Airservices’ failure to provide a sufficient number of ground stations to support full coverage, CASA communications manager Peter Gibson declined to comment and said: “This is a question for Airservices.”
There you go boys, Pinocchio throws AsA under the bus! But hang on, isn't AsA accountable to CAsA's oversight on various matters? Tsk tsk
An AsA 'Snowden' said;
"According to one air-traffic insider, who posted on the industry chat site pprune.org, Airservices reneged on its promise of reliable radar “down to the surface” to cut costs on the project. “(They) decided to try and save some money on the installation by using fewer ground stations than recommended by the suppliers,” he posted. “You get what you pay for.”
Now assuming this is an insider speaking (and not that serial masturbator and all round Troll and corporate footstool Lookleft), we see the real truth seeping out. Budgets before safety!!!
"Less safe skies for all"
Of course they didn't. They would have had to scurry away and formulate some bullshit response. And of course don't forget that Anus 'turtle' Houston would have pulled his head in and hidden like he always does when the hard questions are asked.
The bearded Pinocchio said;
"Asked if this was due to Airservices’ failure to provide a sufficient number of ground stations to support full coverage, CASA communications manager Peter Gibson declined to comment and said: “This is a question for Airservices.”
There you go boys, Pinocchio throws AsA under the bus! But hang on, isn't AsA accountable to CAsA's oversight on various matters? Tsk tsk
An AsA 'Snowden' said;
"According to one air-traffic insider, who posted on the industry chat site pprune.org, Airservices reneged on its promise of reliable radar “down to the surface” to cut costs on the project. “(They) decided to try and save some money on the installation by using fewer ground stations than recommended by the suppliers,” he posted. “You get what you pay for.”
Now assuming this is an insider speaking (and not that serial masturbator and all round Troll and corporate footstool Lookleft), we see the real truth seeping out. Budgets before safety!!!
"Less safe skies for all"