07-04-2023, 03:48 PM
And on page 61 of the report we find this from the 2014 Audit:
Runway 26, which was a code 4 precision approach runway, did not have a 300 m wide
strip as required by the standards (notice ‘708937’).
Runway 17/35, which was a code 3 non-precision approach runway, did not have a 300 m
wide strip as required (although beyond the scope of this investigation).
WHY Beyond the scope of this investigation!! Because it would take another 5 years or because it would inconveniently interfere with a previous bullshit report!
Runway 26, which was a code 4 precision approach runway, did not have a 300 m wide
strip as required by the standards (notice ‘708937’).
Runway 17/35, which was a code 3 non-precision approach runway, did not have a 300 m
wide strip as required (although beyond the scope of this investigation).
WHY Beyond the scope of this investigation!! Because it would take another 5 years or because it would inconveniently interfere with a previous bullshit report!