As I said in October. (17/10). Traditional piston engine GA is now regarded as a legacy technology. There will be no further work or investment in improving GA capability or efficiency, except to transition to electric propulsion.
Forget about changing AVmed or the training, maintenance and operation regulations because CASA will use the excuse that they relate only to legacy technologies, therefore there is limited return on investment.
CASA will instead concentrate its investment on a new suite of regulations for drones and E-aircraft. Everything else, including Glen Buckleys case and multiple Senate reviews will be discarded.
"Net Zero" - a big fat zero. No trust. No future. No return on investment. Just endless speculative prattling by the uninformed.
Question 1: how much energy is required by electric aircraft? Where and how will it be generated and how delivered?
Forget about changing AVmed or the training, maintenance and operation regulations because CASA will use the excuse that they relate only to legacy technologies, therefore there is limited return on investment.
CASA will instead concentrate its investment on a new suite of regulations for drones and E-aircraft. Everything else, including Glen Buckleys case and multiple Senate reviews will be discarded.
"Net Zero" - a big fat zero. No trust. No future. No return on investment. Just endless speculative prattling by the uninformed.
Question 1: how much energy is required by electric aircraft? Where and how will it be generated and how delivered?