07-06-2015, 09:57 PM
ASA said;
"However, Airservices said it had never intended to use TASWAM, which cost $6 million, for surveillance approaches, saying it had achieved the goal of “improved situational awareness for controllers”.
Oh well, it was only a small outlay of $6 million. Surely somebody in ASA must have met a KPI by introducing this technology, and received a bonus as a reward for meeting that same KPI??
"However, Airservices said it had never intended to use TASWAM, which cost $6 million, for surveillance approaches, saying it had achieved the goal of “improved situational awareness for controllers”.
Oh well, it was only a small outlay of $6 million. Surely somebody in ASA must have met a KPI by introducing this technology, and received a bonus as a reward for meeting that same KPI??