Chapter 1308.
Of a seriously scary story is provided to the 20/20 inquiry by the Australian Experimental Aircraft Association. The submission, stand alone, is worthy of the most serious attention the Senate committee can muster.
Written in clear, concise easily understood terms; the submission also brings into focus, in a nutshell, one of the most basic unilateral concerns the industry, from top to grass roots shares.
"Part 149 is designed by CASA to push legitimate CASA functions in safety administration of sport and recreational aviation on to various private bodies which results in needless duplication, expense and poor safety outcomes."
Applicable across the entire aviation spectrum; few if any, would disagree with the general summation of the CASA failure to perform design function and deliberate shifting of all liability for the failure of the regulatory system.
"It also pushes legal liability on to some private citizens in their “supervision” of other private citizens activities and effectively makes these private organisations policemen, judges and juries where “members” are not afforded the normal legal protections of Australian citizens and where there is CASA compulsion to join these bodies."
Again, and again, we see the 'normal' protections of the 'accused' eradicated through 'variable compliance' as decided by CASA and the erosion of constitutional rights through 'strict liability'.
"CASA pushes these bodies to have their own “disciplinary” methods and procedures, aka “kangaroo courts” with none of the normal protections of protections of Australian Law. For example, right to silence, right to representation, lack of proper consideration of evidence etc."
As 'law makers' and publicly elected representatives of the Australian people; surely the Senate committee can grasp the the simple 'wrongness' in the above paragraph.
"All of this is greatly expensive as each Part 149 organisation writes its own voluminous airworthiness and operations manuals and administers them and there are absurd differences in requirements for no good reason."
The greatest con game exposed in the paragraph above; CASA demand more money, more staff, more power and some fairly hefty salary packages whist loading not only the cost and the work on the aviation industry, but the legal responsibility for all of the above.
It is a national disgrace - but; nice work if you can get it. And, get it you can, courtesy of a blind, bipartinsane government which is quite happy to spend millions on inquiry to ensure the status quo of CASA is never changed. Disgusting misuse of the democracy Australia fought for and cherishes.
Toot - toot....
Of a seriously scary story is provided to the 20/20 inquiry by the Australian Experimental Aircraft Association. The submission, stand alone, is worthy of the most serious attention the Senate committee can muster.
Written in clear, concise easily understood terms; the submission also brings into focus, in a nutshell, one of the most basic unilateral concerns the industry, from top to grass roots shares.
"Part 149 is designed by CASA to push legitimate CASA functions in safety administration of sport and recreational aviation on to various private bodies which results in needless duplication, expense and poor safety outcomes."
Applicable across the entire aviation spectrum; few if any, would disagree with the general summation of the CASA failure to perform design function and deliberate shifting of all liability for the failure of the regulatory system.
"It also pushes legal liability on to some private citizens in their “supervision” of other private citizens activities and effectively makes these private organisations policemen, judges and juries where “members” are not afforded the normal legal protections of Australian citizens and where there is CASA compulsion to join these bodies."
Again, and again, we see the 'normal' protections of the 'accused' eradicated through 'variable compliance' as decided by CASA and the erosion of constitutional rights through 'strict liability'.
"CASA pushes these bodies to have their own “disciplinary” methods and procedures, aka “kangaroo courts” with none of the normal protections of protections of Australian Law. For example, right to silence, right to representation, lack of proper consideration of evidence etc."
As 'law makers' and publicly elected representatives of the Australian people; surely the Senate committee can grasp the the simple 'wrongness' in the above paragraph.
"All of this is greatly expensive as each Part 149 organisation writes its own voluminous airworthiness and operations manuals and administers them and there are absurd differences in requirements for no good reason."
The greatest con game exposed in the paragraph above; CASA demand more money, more staff, more power and some fairly hefty salary packages whist loading not only the cost and the work on the aviation industry, but the legal responsibility for all of the above.
It is a national disgrace - but; nice work if you can get it. And, get it you can, courtesy of a blind, bipartinsane government which is quite happy to spend millions on inquiry to ensure the status quo of CASA is never changed. Disgusting misuse of the democracy Australia fought for and cherishes.
Toot - toot....