06-23-2015, 02:16 PM
I do not see how any sort of false story or any regurgitated 12 months later false story puts the Inmarsat data in doubt. They could have checked the flights soon as that story was first reported and debunked it a lot sooner, probably they did check. Why was it not news back then. Inmarsat data is still exactly the same as it ever was, someone just needs to come up with a new theory and some new calculations to fit the data.
I mean why ever did they think the autopilot was on in the first place? Because the Malaysians said they had tracked it traveling between waypoints, or was it the human intervention thing with the transponder being "turned off" and the plane flying low to avoid radar, or shadowing some other plane. Most of what the Malaysians have said has proved to be unreliable, where is the proof supporting the autopilot theory? Not that false cell tower contact, that was not mentioned in the Factual Report.
http://fox4kc.com/2014/04/14/u-s-officia...-vanished/
They would have surely made something of that if they had actual proof. Why leave that little red herring out there so long? yes they should restart the entire investigation and throw out a few assumptions they made.
If MH370 tried to avoid hitting something what would be the faster way to turn? If they did drop suddenly, because something happened, how would they get the plane back under control, not I think by relying on the autopilot. What ever happened on that plane the calculations with autopilot and waypoints seem to have failed, so how did they go wrong, all those people dropping end points on that 7th arc?
Maybe they best start assuming a more direct course to the SIO, with no pilot control and that MH370 flew through that 7th arc and kept going. Which would probably lead back to where the Australians deserted the original search to go on some wild goose chase. They had the facts about how much fuel was on board, yet they were searching farther south, did not discount that area back then did they. No they did that later, on the 27th March.
I mean why ever did they think the autopilot was on in the first place? Because the Malaysians said they had tracked it traveling between waypoints, or was it the human intervention thing with the transponder being "turned off" and the plane flying low to avoid radar, or shadowing some other plane. Most of what the Malaysians have said has proved to be unreliable, where is the proof supporting the autopilot theory? Not that false cell tower contact, that was not mentioned in the Factual Report.
http://fox4kc.com/2014/04/14/u-s-officia...-vanished/
They would have surely made something of that if they had actual proof. Why leave that little red herring out there so long? yes they should restart the entire investigation and throw out a few assumptions they made.
If MH370 tried to avoid hitting something what would be the faster way to turn? If they did drop suddenly, because something happened, how would they get the plane back under control, not I think by relying on the autopilot. What ever happened on that plane the calculations with autopilot and waypoints seem to have failed, so how did they go wrong, all those people dropping end points on that 7th arc?
Maybe they best start assuming a more direct course to the SIO, with no pilot control and that MH370 flew through that 7th arc and kept going. Which would probably lead back to where the Australians deserted the original search to go on some wild goose chase. They had the facts about how much fuel was on board, yet they were searching farther south, did not discount that area back then did they. No they did that later, on the 27th March.