08-05-2019, 06:28 PM
ANAO confirm ASA and Dept take the piss on Govt oversight -
It's now official that the aviation safety bureaucracy, in particular Harfwit's ASA, totally ignore and/or obfuscate all accountability through Government (ANAO)/Parliamentary inquiry and audit findings/recommendations. Today the ANAO (office of the proverbial wet lettuce) released their "Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary Committee Recommendations" audit report in which Airservices Australia and the Department of Infrastructure etc. were included audited entities: ref - https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance...tions-2019
![[Image: ANAO-implementation-of-parliamentary-recs.jpg]](https://www.anao.gov.au/sites/default/files/anao_report/image/ANAO-implementation-of-parliamentary-recs.jpg)
A couple of disturbing ASA audit report quotes:
Hmm..MTF me thinks??
![Dodgy Dodgy](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
It's now official that the aviation safety bureaucracy, in particular Harfwit's ASA, totally ignore and/or obfuscate all accountability through Government (ANAO)/Parliamentary inquiry and audit findings/recommendations. Today the ANAO (office of the proverbial wet lettuce) released their "Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary Committee Recommendations" audit report in which Airservices Australia and the Department of Infrastructure etc. were included audited entities: ref - https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance...tions-2019
![[Image: ANAO-implementation-of-parliamentary-recs.jpg]](https://www.anao.gov.au/sites/default/files/anao_report/image/ANAO-implementation-of-parliamentary-recs.jpg)
A couple of disturbing ASA audit report quotes:
Quote:Did the entities develop an implementation plan?
Quote:The selected entities did not develop clear implementation plans for all recommendations.
3.1 Successful implementation of audit recommendations requires implementation planning to set clear responsibilities and timeframes for addressing the required action. Implementation planning should involve key stakeholders, including the internal audit function.
3.2 Airservices Australia (Airservices) agreed to the six recommendations arising from Auditor-General Report No.1 2016–17 Procurement of the International Centre for Complex Project Management to Assist on the OneSKY Australia Program (the ICCPM audit). Airservices advised the ANAO that, as the entity was working to quickly address the recommendations, implementation plans were not developed to monitor the progress of agreed actions. Rather, Airservices relied on a table of initiatives to assess progress, provide status updates, and describe planned actions to address the recommendations. Airservices has acknowledged that affecting cultural change within the organisation will take time. The evidence reviewed by the ANAO indicates that, as at May 2019, actions against the ICCPM audit recommendations, particularly against recommendation one, remain ongoing.
Did entities maintain evidence to confirm the implementation of ANAO recommendations?
Quote:Entities did not maintain sufficient and appropriate evidence to clearly demonstrate that all recommendations have been implemented.
3.7 Airservices agreed to the six recommendations arising from the ICCPM audit. In October 2016, the Chair of Airservices’ Board advised the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport that all ANAO recommendations had been addressed by 30 September 2016. Further, Airservices’ 2016–17 Annual Report stated that implementation of all six recommendations was completed by 30 September 2016.46
3.8 Airservices provided evidence of a range of actions taken in response to the recommendations, many of which remain ongoing at May 2019. Further, Airservices has undertaken a number of internal audits and reviews which highlight that weaknesses remain in Airservices’ procurement policies and procedures which has impacted on the achievement of the agreed culture shift.
3.9 As Airservices did not develop implementation plans to respond to the recommendations, there is no evidence of intended outcomes, including benchmarks and targets or robust measures to assess progress achieved. As such, Airservices has not been able to evaluate its performance against the implementation of the recommendations or identify when the intended result has been achieved.
3.14 Overall, Airservices’ reporting of the recommendations as completed by 30 September 2016 more accurately reflected the commencement of actions to address the recommendations, rather than the intended outcomes being achieved and therefore the completion of implementation. While action has occurred against each of the recommendations, Airservices has only partially or not fully implemented the recommendations from the ICCPM audit. Refer to Table 3.4 for further detail.
Recommendation no.1
3.17 Entities finalise implementation of 2016–17 ANAO performance audit recommendations. Specifically:
Airservices Australia response: Disagreed. - WTF?
- Airservices complete implementation of the recommendations from Auditor-General Report No.1 2016–17 Procurement of the International Centre for Complex Project Management to Assist on the OneSKY Australia Program;
![]()
Hmm..MTF me thinks??
![Rolleyes Rolleyes](https://auntypru.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)