ARFFS Inquiry Update 4/4/19: Dear Sterlo - L&Ks Harfwit.
1
Response by Airservices Australia to evidence provided to the inquiry, dated and received 2 April 2019.
![[Image: D3Qq8wzUwAAl0XI.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Qq8wzUwAAl0XI.jpg)
1
Questions taken on notice at a public hearing in Melbourne, Victoria on 14 March 2019 by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Answer received 28 March 2019.
![[Image: D3Qx9wUUUAEfnt5.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Qx9wUUUAEfnt5.jpg)
P2 comments: After reading the Perth Airport RFFS safety case (from pg 5 of the AQON) it doesn't take an Einstein to realise that the whole review is just a tick-a-box routine. For example a quote, from page 11 of 17 of the safety case review, under the heading of 'Design Safety Management Activities':
![[Image: D3Q3L0NUYAAFq7S.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Q3L0NUYAAFq7S.jpg)
In other words there was nothing to see before the safety case review, therefore there is 'still nothing see here - move along!'
I was curious to understand why it was that CASA decided to deploy their 'Stakeholder' spin doctor to the Melbourne hearing but after re-reading the Hansard - see Hansard link HERE - and now reading the weasel worded AQON, I fully understand why - degrees of separation for Carmody Capers and the Iron Ring...
However, given that Walker was the former spin doctor to ASA for 8 years, much like the Hooded Canary with the 2nd PelAir (cover-up) investigation, shouldn't he have excused himself from all involvement from this Inquiry?
Finally another addition to the submission pages: 25 Aviation Fire and Rescue Brisbane (PDF 22 KB)
MTF...P2
1
![[Image: pdf.png]](https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Images/pdf.png)
![[Image: D3Qq8wzUwAAl0XI.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Qq8wzUwAAl0XI.jpg)
1
![[Image: pdf.png]](https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Images/pdf.png)
![[Image: D3Qx9wUUUAEfnt5.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Qx9wUUUAEfnt5.jpg)
P2 comments: After reading the Perth Airport RFFS safety case (from pg 5 of the AQON) it doesn't take an Einstein to realise that the whole review is just a tick-a-box routine. For example a quote, from page 11 of 17 of the safety case review, under the heading of 'Design Safety Management Activities':
![[Image: D3Q3L0NUYAAFq7S.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3Q3L0NUYAAFq7S.jpg)
In other words there was nothing to see before the safety case review, therefore there is 'still nothing see here - move along!'
Quote:Experience
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Group Manager Stakeholder Engagement
Company Name Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Dates Employed 2016 – Present
Employment Duration 3 yrs
Location Canberra, Australia
Airservices Australia
Manager Corporate Communication
Company Name Airservices Australia
Dates Employed 2008 – 2016
Employment Duration 8 yrs
Location Canberra, Australia
I was curious to understand why it was that CASA decided to deploy their 'Stakeholder' spin doctor to the Melbourne hearing but after re-reading the Hansard - see Hansard link HERE - and now reading the weasel worded AQON, I fully understand why - degrees of separation for Carmody Capers and the Iron Ring...

However, given that Walker was the former spin doctor to ASA for 8 years, much like the Hooded Canary with the 2nd PelAir (cover-up) investigation, shouldn't he have excused himself from all involvement from this Inquiry?
Finally another addition to the submission pages: 25 Aviation Fire and Rescue Brisbane (PDF 22 KB)
MTF...P2
