09-07-2018, 12:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2018, 01:29 PM by thorn bird.)
Other than making Australia the most expensive place in
the world to learn to fly, what else has CAsA's world leading gobbledygook
achieved?
Well its certainly reduced participation as illustrated by the decline in pilot numbers.
Its certainly reduced employment with all the school closures.
Its certainly driven up the price of fuel (lower Volume).
Has it made it safer?
There is not a shred of evidence that it has, in fact there is evidence of the opposite.
Has it improved piloting skills and standards? There is not a shred of evidence that it has.
Has it made things simpler?
The addition of a few thousand extra pages more of legalise would certainly keep a Phalanx of lawyers happy
interpreting them. Problem is the industry has been so impoverished it cant afford lawyers.
CAsA can!!
Perhaps the Sociopathic Scottish Git can explain how any of it is of benefit to the industry, the public, or the nation as a whole.
Rather than flapping his gums trying to illustrate how much effort, and pubic funds, CAsA has expended in a desperate effort to explain what the reg's mean or intend. Of course it would never occur to the incompetent clowns that if they simply copied the worlds most successful GA regulations from the Americans, not only would a poultice of public money been saved but the GA industry in Australia just might stand a chance of survival.
Mr Crawford what exactly did this train wreck legislation cost the Australian public and exactly what was the point of it?
the world to learn to fly, what else has CAsA's world leading gobbledygook
achieved?
Well its certainly reduced participation as illustrated by the decline in pilot numbers.
Its certainly reduced employment with all the school closures.
Its certainly driven up the price of fuel (lower Volume).
Has it made it safer?
There is not a shred of evidence that it has, in fact there is evidence of the opposite.
Has it improved piloting skills and standards? There is not a shred of evidence that it has.
Has it made things simpler?
The addition of a few thousand extra pages more of legalise would certainly keep a Phalanx of lawyers happy
interpreting them. Problem is the industry has been so impoverished it cant afford lawyers.
CAsA can!!
Perhaps the Sociopathic Scottish Git can explain how any of it is of benefit to the industry, the public, or the nation as a whole.
Rather than flapping his gums trying to illustrate how much effort, and pubic funds, CAsA has expended in a desperate effort to explain what the reg's mean or intend. Of course it would never occur to the incompetent clowns that if they simply copied the worlds most successful GA regulations from the Americans, not only would a poultice of public money been saved but the GA industry in Australia just might stand a chance of survival.
Mr Crawford what exactly did this train wreck legislation cost the Australian public and exactly what was the point of it?