AMROBA BREAKING NEWS! 
Via AP emails:
Plus:
![[Image: Impossible-to-Change-2024-1.jpg]](https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Impossible-to-Change-2024-1.jpg)
![[Image: Impossible-to-Change-2024-2.jpg]](https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Impossible-to-Change-2024-2.jpg)
![[Image: Impossible-to-Change-2024-3.jpg]](https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Impossible-to-Change-2024-3.jpg)
![[Image: Impossible-to-Change-2024-4.jpg]](https://auntypru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Impossible-to-Change-2024-4.jpg)
On the subject of increased regulatory imposed costs, perhaps it is time that industry stakeholders got together and consulted to the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation Committee and/or the Scrutiny of Bills Committee in order to disallow legislative instruments and/or challenge/amend intended new CASA introduced Bills?
Example of the power these Committees do have if and when they decide there is an issue in the draft legislation:
From the 21 August 2024 DLM:
Principle (f) by the way reads...
(f) it, and any document it incorporates, may be freely accessed and used;
MTF...P2
Via AP emails:
Quote:To all members,
Breaking News, September 2024.
Aviation is a dynamic industry that is ever changing. Regulations and regulatory standards need to change too.
Civil aviation regulatory changes, especially prescriptive regulations and standards are a restriction of innovation and dynamic changes.
When regulations have been introduced, e.g. Part 66 that saw a drop in LAMEs being produced from 300 pa to 130pa, refer White Paper, then these regulations definitely have not benefited the employers and training industry.
Like CASR Part 21 that is unique in the world that approve Class products that no other nation use. There are many samples.
I can remember when I was involved, we asked what benefits a proposed change will be for the industry. Safety, economical, reduced red tape,
We understand the machinery of government that only provides for limited time during each government to submit amendments into parliament.
To keep aviation regulations and standards current in a dynamic industry, regulatory changes should be happening regularly.
After all, industry has no option but to move with the times, it would be nice if governments could keep regulations and standards current with a continually modernising program.
I have placed a list of regulatory changes that CASA must find it hard to submit to government for change.
Sadly, we just have to get use to lack of regulatory change to benefit safety and the industry.
Ken Cannane
Executive Director
AMROBA
Phone: (02) 97592715
Mobile: 0408029329
www.amroba.org.au
Safety All Around.
Plus:
On the subject of increased regulatory imposed costs, perhaps it is time that industry stakeholders got together and consulted to the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation Committee and/or the Scrutiny of Bills Committee in order to disallow legislative instruments and/or challenge/amend intended new CASA introduced Bills?
Example of the power these Committees do have if and when they decide there is an issue in the draft legislation:
From the 21 August 2024 DLM:
Quote:CASA EX32/24 — Flight Crew Licensing
and Other Matters (Miscellaneous
Exemptions) Instrument 2024
[F2024L00614]
The agency undertook to progress
amendments to the instrument to address
the committee's scrutiny concerns regarding
principle (f).
16 August 2024
CASA EX32/24 — Flight Crew Licensing
and Other Matters (Miscellaneous
Exemptions) Instrument 2024
[F2024L00614]
The agency undertook to progress
amendments to the explanatory statement to
address the committee's scrutiny concerns
regarding principle (f).
16 August 2024
Principle (f) by the way reads...
(f) it, and any document it incorporates, may be freely accessed and used;
MTF...P2