06-12-2015, 10:16 AM
A well worded article by Phelan. Good job Paul.
As for CAsA, as usual, questions must be asked in regards to CAsA's motives, evidence, 'personal opinions', methods to gain a conviction, waste of taxpayer money (CAsA legal should be stripped to the bone) and the absolute misuse of the get out of jail free card called 'fit and proper person'.
If CAsA's 'wriggle points' could be abolished, including the 'fit and proper person' ace in the deck, the misuse of the interpretable 'act' if all else fails when trying to hang an operator/individual, and removal of soft statements such as 'in line with best practise models' when they try to justify introducing something that is completely shit and they don't have something solid to measure the crappy rule or processes against, we would end up with a more transparent, workable, just and fit and proper industry!!!!
As for CAsA, as usual, questions must be asked in regards to CAsA's motives, evidence, 'personal opinions', methods to gain a conviction, waste of taxpayer money (CAsA legal should be stripped to the bone) and the absolute misuse of the get out of jail free card called 'fit and proper person'.
If CAsA's 'wriggle points' could be abolished, including the 'fit and proper person' ace in the deck, the misuse of the interpretable 'act' if all else fails when trying to hang an operator/individual, and removal of soft statements such as 'in line with best practise models' when they try to justify introducing something that is completely shit and they don't have something solid to measure the crappy rule or processes against, we would end up with a more transparent, workable, just and fit and proper industry!!!!