04-06-2020, 03:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2020, 03:56 PM by thorn bird.)
It would seem the end game for Bankstown Airport has begun, the true Master plan is slowly revealing itself as apposed to the Fake master plan that those that be have been playing lip service to.
Bankstown is to become an industrial park and a heliport supporting police and emergency services only. The unfortunate result of leasing airport land to development sharks with no oversight. Mc Bank were smart enough to understand that the value was not in the airports, the value was in the land itself as illustrated by them engineering the demise of Hoxton Park, returning all the capital they expended to buy the leases to all three airports.
They then played the long game, price aviation off the airports over time, eventually the land would be free to develop.
Maybe that was always the intention, who knows? Maybe the Murky Mandarin and beaker, who set the whole process up understood that? Maybe not?
Murky was pretty astute, Beaker was as dumb as bat sh**t, but were they together as astute as McBank?
Somewhat doubtful.
Certainly combined the minister of the day stood no chance of seeing the wood from the tree's.
Stage one has started, the big earth movers have moved onto the Southern precinct stirring up asbestos contaminated dust and PFAS to waft over the surrounding suburbs. The next 100 year flood could prove interesting.
Nefarious characters lurking around the Northern side doing fire inspections but in reality assessing demolition costs of the hangers there in preparation for stage two.
What I find hard to understand is how a minister of the crown can ignore the law or the conditions of leases the government signed.
How could an airport developer destroy a flood plain by producing their own environmental impact statement?
How could they destroy airport infrastructure in breach of their lease conditions?
How could they neglect the maintenance of heritage listed structures to the extent that they are now beyond restoration?
Why does a Trust own the lease to the airport Prohibited by the Airport Act?
Why does a development shark run the airport also prohibited by the Airport Act?
I would love someone to ask the current minister to answer these questions but of course nobody will ever ask them.
The Law in Australia is supposed act for everyone. Justice is only available to them that can afford it.
Secondary Airports in Australia's capital cities are living proof that you cannot beat the big end of town.
Bankstown is to become an industrial park and a heliport supporting police and emergency services only. The unfortunate result of leasing airport land to development sharks with no oversight. Mc Bank were smart enough to understand that the value was not in the airports, the value was in the land itself as illustrated by them engineering the demise of Hoxton Park, returning all the capital they expended to buy the leases to all three airports.
They then played the long game, price aviation off the airports over time, eventually the land would be free to develop.
Maybe that was always the intention, who knows? Maybe the Murky Mandarin and beaker, who set the whole process up understood that? Maybe not?
Murky was pretty astute, Beaker was as dumb as bat sh**t, but were they together as astute as McBank?
Somewhat doubtful.
Certainly combined the minister of the day stood no chance of seeing the wood from the tree's.
Stage one has started, the big earth movers have moved onto the Southern precinct stirring up asbestos contaminated dust and PFAS to waft over the surrounding suburbs. The next 100 year flood could prove interesting.
Nefarious characters lurking around the Northern side doing fire inspections but in reality assessing demolition costs of the hangers there in preparation for stage two.
What I find hard to understand is how a minister of the crown can ignore the law or the conditions of leases the government signed.
How could an airport developer destroy a flood plain by producing their own environmental impact statement?
How could they destroy airport infrastructure in breach of their lease conditions?
How could they neglect the maintenance of heritage listed structures to the extent that they are now beyond restoration?
Why does a Trust own the lease to the airport Prohibited by the Airport Act?
Why does a development shark run the airport also prohibited by the Airport Act?
I would love someone to ask the current minister to answer these questions but of course nobody will ever ask them.
The Law in Australia is supposed act for everyone. Justice is only available to them that can afford it.
Secondary Airports in Australia's capital cities are living proof that you cannot beat the big end of town.