Disappointing?
Seems Dick’s is not the only ‘anonymous’ letter surfacing. The following arrived in the AP mail box a short while ago. The legal eagle read it – as writ - turned a strange colour and gently pushed it back over the coffee shop table with the tip of his pencil, gently shook his head and changed the subject. P6. a.k.a. Ping- ping, attempted to track the source, but the pathway from the originator to our post box was complex and beyond his humble skills. So there I was, coffee cooling and looking at an untouchable, anonymous, untraceable email. What to do?
I admit to shelving it: justifying the action by thinking that if the writer was serious, the full draft could be sent off to the Senate committee and examined in camera, under privilege. I have no idea if this occurred.
Anyway, long story short. What we have is an unsigned, anonymous letter; it could have been written by anybody; containing untested, unsupported allegations, some libellous comments and many conclusions which may; or, may not be true. If any of this is ever proven, through due process and proper testing, then it is a serious matter. As it stands, it is simply suspect ‘gossip’ of a malicious nature. I have destroyed the original, but retained the following de-identified version.
My purpose in publishing the following version is the hope that the ‘writer’ will have the courage and fortitude to provide a signed version, with supporting documentation, to the appropriate authority. Gossip of this nature detracts from the efforts of the Senators to get a handle on the true picture of what has really been occurring within the ASA organisation. If it can be proven, then it may open the door to deep inquiry. Should the tale be proven as unsubstantiated, scurrilous gossip, then ASA should have the opportunity to defend their actions, name and reputation.
I would urge the ‘writer’ to come out from behind the screen of anonymity, contact one of the Senate standing committee, offer proof; or, retract the statements made. I have little empathy, sympathy or even concern for the ‘management’ levels of ASA. But, fair is fair; and, ASA must be allowed to rebut accusations made. So, if this is ‘dinkum’ let’s have the supporting evidence; or, stop sending anonymous, hearsay to those who cannot possibly assist in any way – except to call this for what it is; an unsubstantiated attack on ‘persons’. This rather than empirical evidence of a corporation acting in bad faith, is pointless. Send that evidence and I’ll blast to the world; but remember, someone wrote a nasty, unsigned note to Heff; bad mistake (huge).
Anyway FWIW here is a doctored version of our anonymous missive:-
Toot - MTF? - toot...
...No pot-shots please. Just the messenger.
Seems Dick’s is not the only ‘anonymous’ letter surfacing. The following arrived in the AP mail box a short while ago. The legal eagle read it – as writ - turned a strange colour and gently pushed it back over the coffee shop table with the tip of his pencil, gently shook his head and changed the subject. P6. a.k.a. Ping- ping, attempted to track the source, but the pathway from the originator to our post box was complex and beyond his humble skills. So there I was, coffee cooling and looking at an untouchable, anonymous, untraceable email. What to do?
I admit to shelving it: justifying the action by thinking that if the writer was serious, the full draft could be sent off to the Senate committee and examined in camera, under privilege. I have no idea if this occurred.
Anyway, long story short. What we have is an unsigned, anonymous letter; it could have been written by anybody; containing untested, unsupported allegations, some libellous comments and many conclusions which may; or, may not be true. If any of this is ever proven, through due process and proper testing, then it is a serious matter. As it stands, it is simply suspect ‘gossip’ of a malicious nature. I have destroyed the original, but retained the following de-identified version.
My purpose in publishing the following version is the hope that the ‘writer’ will have the courage and fortitude to provide a signed version, with supporting documentation, to the appropriate authority. Gossip of this nature detracts from the efforts of the Senators to get a handle on the true picture of what has really been occurring within the ASA organisation. If it can be proven, then it may open the door to deep inquiry. Should the tale be proven as unsubstantiated, scurrilous gossip, then ASA should have the opportunity to defend their actions, name and reputation.
I would urge the ‘writer’ to come out from behind the screen of anonymity, contact one of the Senate standing committee, offer proof; or, retract the statements made. I have little empathy, sympathy or even concern for the ‘management’ levels of ASA. But, fair is fair; and, ASA must be allowed to rebut accusations made. So, if this is ‘dinkum’ let’s have the supporting evidence; or, stop sending anonymous, hearsay to those who cannot possibly assist in any way – except to call this for what it is; an unsubstantiated attack on ‘persons’. This rather than empirical evidence of a corporation acting in bad faith, is pointless. Send that evidence and I’ll blast to the world; but remember, someone wrote a nasty, unsigned note to Heff; bad mistake (huge).
Anyway FWIW here is a doctored version of our anonymous missive:-
Quote:Dear 123.
Where do I start? You have a choice to believe what I am about to tell you or not...frankly, I don't care but this is the facts.
I have been following your Blog particularly in relation to ‘Service’ and the incompetency of management, especially the credit card cover up. I know the whole story here and I am absolutely fed up with the lies and cover up.
The fact is a manager, and former colleague of mine who worked for the ‘Service’ for over 10 years was involved. Unfortunately, he had a relationship with an internal lawyer. This woman XX has a history! She is alleged to have had an inappropriate relationship with the ex ‘Service’ Executive Manager YY, who eventually was forced to resign over expenses incurred directly in relation to providing for XX. YY is married to a prominent ‘person’ ZZ. XX and YY were caught by a number of ‘Service’ staff in a compromising position. As it was too sensitive, it was pushed under the carpet.
As a result of this, YY was forced to resign and the ‘Service’ management structure broke down. At the same time, XX was having another relationship with a ‘Service’ business support manager and a ‘Service’ manager from (City). The business support manager was forced to relocate from the ‘Service’.
My colleague made the biggest mistake of his life getting involved with this internal lawyer who is still practicing law in the company!
The (City) manager unfortunately purchased meals for XX during his stays at in Canberra. Meal allowance is allowed but only for the traveller. He made a mistake.
XX used the YY credit card on a number of occasions and even signed for meals at the (AA) where they would stay together when he was in Canberra.
When the ‘Service’ manager ended the relationship with her, she turned on him and advised management what he was doing. Of course, many lies were also told.
The ‘Service’ manager who was extremely remorseful lost his family as a result of his mistakes. He was terminated from ‘Service’ and his health deteriorated while the investigation was taking place. He was diagnosed with severe depression and spent more than a month in a psych hospital. He attempted suicide twice and is still suffering from this.
XX is still working for Airservices even though she was formally identified as a contributor to the misuse of the credit card.
We have lost a very good manager and (Title). They were both manipulated by XX She is a practicing lawyer! She has committed fraud and the new (Management) knows exactly what went on...
If I were you I would try and obtain more information about this case. I have only scratched the surface. There is a lot more to this.
So why am I telling you this? This has been swept under the carpet...just like a number of other issues...Some of which has serious safety implications, particularly in ‘Service’. The ‘Service’ manager was threatened not to say anything or legal action would pursue. I have compassion for this man and what he lost over meal expenses and some taxi charges to XX home. The total amount was between $2000-3000 I believe over about two years.
XX is a big part of this. I have all the proof you need as the ‘Service’ manager who was involved has shown me signed receipts, emails (even emails between the ex (Title) and XX and many photos. He is a shell of his former self and is still not employed...Some 8 months later and is always heavily medicated. I can’t believe the cover up and injustice here! He wanted to pay the amount back. This man has left a huge legacy in 'Service' with his involvement in many projects that improved our service. He won 2 major awards and in the end was spat out over $3000! I know what he did was wrong but there were more players involved.
I’m sorry but I’d like to remain anonymous at this stage. I am happy to call you if you wish.
Toot - MTF? - toot...
...No pot-shots please. Just the messenger.