Devils and details.
P2 – “Hmm...interesting but does it actually mean anything?”
Good question. There’s one small move on the ‘new’ flow chart which is interesting; the Industry Complaints Commissioner (ICC) now on the same line as the CEO. On the old flow chart the ICC had direct access to the board, which reads a whole better than it actually was in real life. Long delays between actually getting into the board room to speak and limited time allocated rendered the ICC almost nugatory. The constraints placed on the ICC sphere of action and ‘time’ boundary’s further reduced the effectiveness of what has become almost a ‘lip service’ to ‘complaint’.
Nothing wrong with Hanton; one of the ‘goodun’s’ but hamstrung and reluctant to break the imposed boundaries. Nonetheless, he has helped cure a few embuggerance ills. But even then, he is hamstrung as the CEO and the infamous ‘ethics’ committee will never allow the prosecution of a CASA officer – unless of course it is on some matter unrelated to aeronautical embuggerance, like goat shagging or credit card fraud; even then CASA have been known to overlook the odd afternoon and evening where long, liquid lunch has ended up pleasantly, in a cat house, on the tax payers card. Boys will be boys eh?
I digress, blame it on the Bankstown Chronicles; back to the ICC. So now it appears the ICC is aligned with the CEO – does that mean direct access, regular meetings, minutes taken and a general above board approach to complaint? If it does, then this is one of the best moves in recorded history, provided the ethics committee can be kept out of it.
For far too long there has been no way to progress a complaint beyond the stone wall of denial. Maybe integrity, honesty and clarity are a bridge too far, the smart money is on nothing changing despite the window dressing and Hanton’s best ongoing efforts.
So P2 – does it actually mean anything?. Your guess is as good as mine, but going on past performance and current worth – I’d say not. I would be delighted to be proven dead wrong and retract that opinion. Problem is, by the time we work out that it’s a wheel barrow full of pony-pooh – it’s all too late – again – to undo the damage done.
Toot toot.
P2 – “Hmm...interesting but does it actually mean anything?”
Good question. There’s one small move on the ‘new’ flow chart which is interesting; the Industry Complaints Commissioner (ICC) now on the same line as the CEO. On the old flow chart the ICC had direct access to the board, which reads a whole better than it actually was in real life. Long delays between actually getting into the board room to speak and limited time allocated rendered the ICC almost nugatory. The constraints placed on the ICC sphere of action and ‘time’ boundary’s further reduced the effectiveness of what has become almost a ‘lip service’ to ‘complaint’.
Nothing wrong with Hanton; one of the ‘goodun’s’ but hamstrung and reluctant to break the imposed boundaries. Nonetheless, he has helped cure a few embuggerance ills. But even then, he is hamstrung as the CEO and the infamous ‘ethics’ committee will never allow the prosecution of a CASA officer – unless of course it is on some matter unrelated to aeronautical embuggerance, like goat shagging or credit card fraud; even then CASA have been known to overlook the odd afternoon and evening where long, liquid lunch has ended up pleasantly, in a cat house, on the tax payers card. Boys will be boys eh?
I digress, blame it on the Bankstown Chronicles; back to the ICC. So now it appears the ICC is aligned with the CEO – does that mean direct access, regular meetings, minutes taken and a general above board approach to complaint? If it does, then this is one of the best moves in recorded history, provided the ethics committee can be kept out of it.
For far too long there has been no way to progress a complaint beyond the stone wall of denial. Maybe integrity, honesty and clarity are a bridge too far, the smart money is on nothing changing despite the window dressing and Hanton’s best ongoing efforts.
So P2 – does it actually mean anything?. Your guess is as good as mine, but going on past performance and current worth – I’d say not. I would be delighted to be proven dead wrong and retract that opinion. Problem is, by the time we work out that it’s a wheel barrow full of pony-pooh – it’s all too late – again – to undo the damage done.
Toot toot.